§Why CasetextPricing

Gaylor v. U.S. Department of Justice

REPLY to opposition to motion re MOTION for Summary Judgment

11 Cited authorities

  1. SafeCard Servs., Inc. v. SEC

    926 F.2d 1197 (D.C. Cir. 1991)   Cited 1,697 times
    Holding that information in law enforcement records identifying private individuals is exempt from disclosure unless release is necessary to "confirm or refute compelling evidence that the agency is engaged in illegal activity"

  2. Oglesby v. U.S. Dept. of Army

    920 F.2d 57 (D.C. Cir. 1990)   Cited 1,542 times
    Holding that FOIA administrative exhaustion requirement is jurisdictional

  3. Nation Magazine, Washington Bureau v. U.S.

    71 F.3d 885 (D.C. Cir. 1995)   Cited 687 times
    Holding that "an obvious privacy interest . . . extends to third parties who may be mentioned in investigatory files, as well as to witnesses and informants who have provided information during the course of an investigation"

  4. Steinberg v. U.S. Dept. of Justice

    23 F.3d 548 (D.C. Cir. 1994)   Cited 611 times
    Holding that the FBI's search was still adequate even though it did not cross-reference documents mentioned in responsive records

  5. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. Bender

    127 F.3d 58 (D.C. Cir. 1997)   Cited 324 times
    Finding no abuse of discretion in Court's enforcement of local rule by "treat[ing] the FDIC's motion for summary judgment as conceded"

  6. Miller v. United States Dept. of State

    779 F.2d 1378 (8th Cir. 1985)   Cited 345 times
    Holding that an agency carries its burden of proof by providing affidavits to explain why documents are subject to an exemption

  7. Hopkins v. Women's Division

    238 F. Supp. 2d 174 (D.D.C. 2002)   Cited 170 times
    Finding it proper to consider arguments conceded when not addressed in the opposition to a motion to dismiss

  8. National Cable Television Ass'n, v. F.C.C.

    479 F.2d 183 (D.C. Cir. 1973)   Cited 161 times
    Noting agency's burden to "prove that each document that falls within the class requested either has been produced, is unidentifiable, or is wholly exempt from [the FOIA's] inspection requirements"

  9. U.S. v. Real Property

    287 F. Supp. 2d 45 (D.D.C. 2003)   Cited 42 times
    Finding that a similar local rule applies to "specific arguments within a memorandum opposing a motion"

  10. Bancoult v. McNamara

    227 F. Supp. 2d 144 (D.D.C. 2002)   Cited 42 times
    Denying preliminary injunction where “the parties hotly dispute [d] certain basic points”