18 Cited authorities

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

    509 U.S. 579 (1993)   Cited 26,335 times   228 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a trial judge must ensure that all admitted expert testimony "is not only relevant, but reliable"
  2. Kumho Tire Co. v. Carmichael

    526 U.S. 137 (1999)   Cited 12,638 times   30 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Daubert gatekeeping standard applies not only to "scientific testimony" but also to "all expert testimony"
  3. General Electric Co. v. Joiner

    522 U.S. 136 (1997)   Cited 4,871 times   42 Legal Analyses
    Holding that under the abuse of discretion standard the appellate court will not reverse unless the ruling is manifestly erroneous
  4. Jonasson v. Lutheran Child and Family Services

    115 F.3d 436 (7th Cir. 1997)   Cited 730 times
    Upholding award of punitive damages where an employer demonstrated "ostrich-like" behavior by ignoring repeated complaints about a harasser
  5. Wilson v. Williams

    182 F.3d 562 (7th Cir. 1999)   Cited 277 times
    Holding that adaptation to adverse ruling on motion in limine did not waive established objection
  6. Clark v. Takata Corp.

    192 F.3d 750 (7th Cir. 1999)   Cited 213 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that either "hands on testing" or "review of experimental, statistical, or other scientific data generated by others in the field" may suffice as a reasonable methodology upon which to base an opinion
  7. Gaia Technologies, Inc. v. Reconversion Technologies, Inc.

    93 F.3d 774 (Fed. Cir. 1996)   Cited 98 times
    Holding that an assignment, executed on October 24, 1994, but which claimed to be effective "prior to Gaia's filing of the instant suit," was not sufficient to confer standing on Gaia
  8. Wendler v. American Intern

    521 F.3d 790 (7th Cir. 2008)   Cited 62 times
    Ruling expert’s ipse dixit conclusion inadmissible when report failed to say what software was used, what data was entered, what results were produced, and how alternative explanations were ruled out
  9. Central Mfg., Inc. v. Brett

    492 F.3d 876 (7th Cir. 2007)   Cited 60 times
    Holding that “[a]n action for trademark infringement can only succeed if, among other things, the plaintiff owns the mark,” and although “[r]egistration provides prima facie evidence of ownership ..., [u]ltimately, it is not the fact of registration that matters so much as the use of the mark in commerce”
  10. Kelley v. Chicago Park Dist

    635 F.3d 290 (7th Cir. 2011)   Cited 38 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Questioning Phillips's limitation on the public presentation exception and discussing why the public presentation exception may be applicable to art that integrates its location as one of its elements
  11. Rule 702 - Testimony by Expert Witnesses

    Fed. R. Evid. 702   Cited 26,717 times   256 Legal Analyses
    Adopting the Daubert standard
  12. Rule 5 - Serving and Filing Pleadings and Other Papers

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 5   Cited 22,113 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Allowing service by filing papers with the court's electronic-filing system
  13. Section 410 - Registration of claim and issuance of certificate

    17 U.S.C. § 410   Cited 1,498 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Finding that production of a certificate of copyright registration gave rise to a rebuttable presumption that copyright was valid
  14. Section 202.1 - Material not subject to copyright

    37 C.F.R. § 202.1   Cited 249 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Denying registration to "[w]ords and short phrases such as names, titles, and slogans; familiar symbols and designs; mere variations of typographic ornamentation, lettering or coloring; mere listing of ingredients or contents."