4 Cited authorities

  1. Anderson v. Cryovac, Inc.

    862 F.2d 910 (1st Cir. 1988)   Cited 276 times
    Holding "misconduct" under Rule 60(b) does not require proof of intent to deceive
  2. In re NTL, Inc. Securities Litigation

    244 F.R.D. 179 (S.D.N.Y. 2007)   Cited 140 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that movant was not required to submit extrinsic proof of relevance where movant had established gross negligence
  3. Mercy Catholic Med. Ctr. v. Thompson

    380 F.3d 142 (3d Cir. 2004)   Cited 111 times
    Holding that control under Fed.R.Civ.P. 34 is “the legal right or ability to obtain the documents from another source upon demand”
  4. Rule 5 - Serving and Filing Pleadings and Other Papers

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 5   Cited 23,699 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Providing for service via CM/ECF Systems