6 Cited authorities

  1. Anderson v. Cryovac, Inc.

    862 F.2d 910 (1st Cir. 1988)   Cited 274 times
    Holding "misconduct" under Rule 60(b) does not require proof of intent to deceive
  2. In re NTL, Inc. Securities Litigation

    244 F.R.D. 179 (S.D.N.Y. 2007)   Cited 137 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that movant was not required to submit extrinsic proof of relevance where movant had established gross negligence
  3. Mercy Catholic Med. Ctr. v. Thompson

    380 F.3d 142 (3d Cir. 2004)   Cited 106 times
    Holding that control under Fed.R.Civ.P. 34 is “the legal right or ability to obtain the documents from another source upon demand”
  4. Rule 37 - Failure to Make Disclosures or to Cooperate in Discovery; Sanctions

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 37   Cited 47,073 times   326 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a party may be barred from using a witness if it fails to disclose the witness
  5. Rule 5 - Serving and Filing Pleadings and Other Papers

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 5   Cited 22,753 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Allowing service by filing papers with the court's electronic-filing system
  6. Rule 34 - Producing Documents, Electronically Stored Information, and Tangible Things, or Entering onto Land, for Inspection and Other Purposes

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 34   Cited 13,452 times   152 Legal Analyses
    Finding that the rules related to electronic discovery were "not meant to create a routine right of direct access to a party's electronic information system, although such access may be justified in some circumstances."