30 Cited authorities

Conley v. Gibson
355 U.S. 41 (1957) Cited 58,634 times 25 Legal Analyses
Holding that "a complaint should not be dismissed for failure to state a claim unless it appears beyond doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of his claim which would entitle him to relief"
Varity Corp. v. Howe
516 U.S. 489 (1996) Cited 2,388 times 33 Legal Analyses
Holding that ERISA fiduciaries may have duties to disclose information about plan prospects that they have no duty, or even power, to change
Mertens v. Hewitt Assocs
508 U.S. 248 (1993) Cited 1,844 times 24 Legal Analyses
Holding that relief under section 502 is limited to remedies traditionally available in equity, such as injunctions, mandamus, and restitution
Sereboff v. Mid Atlantic Medical Services, Inc.
547 U.S. 356 (2006) Cited 613 times 28 Legal Analyses
Holding portion of beneficiary's settlement constituted specifically identifiable funds subject to equitable lien
Mylan Laboratories, Inc. v. Matkari
7 F.3d 1130 (4th Cir. 1993) Cited 4,041 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that the plaintiff's "claims that the defendants falsely represented that their drugs had been ‘properly approved by the FDA’ must fail"
Holman v. State of Ind.
211 F.3d 399 (7th Cir. 2000) Cited 267 times
Holding that Title VII does not provide a remedy when both sexes are treated badly because Title VII is predicated on discrimination
Curcio v. John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. Co.
33 F.3d 226 (3d Cir. 1994) Cited 273 times
Holding widow beneficiary satisfied detrimental reliance element where she and employee husband refused supplemental insurance under plan due to misrepresentation
Griggs v. E.I. Dupont De Nemours & Co.
237 F.3d 371 (4th Cir. 2001) Cited 195 times
Holding that "reinstatement, as a genera] equitable concept, is within the range of redress permitted," and remanding for inquiry into whether reinstatement of the parties to the pre-election status quo was appropriate
In re Unisys Corp.
57 F.3d 1255 (3d Cir. 1995) Cited 183 times
Holding that "restitutionary reimbursement of back benefits" is form of equitable relief available under § 502
Certiorari Denied
531 U.S. 880 (2000) Cited 49 times
Finding that Hopper held that not every regulatory violation is a "knowingly false statement" and distinguishing this holding from a materiality requirement
Rule 54 - Judgment; Costs
Fed. R. Civ. P. 54 Cited 41,439 times 143 Legal Analyses
Holding party seeking fees may additionally seek "nontaxable expenses"
Section 1132 - Civil enforcement
29 U.S.C. § 1132 Cited 26,353 times 171 Legal Analyses
Holding liable "[a]ny administrator" who fails to provide documents in a timely manner

Fulton et al v. Harrison et al

30 Cited authorities

Holding that "a complaint should not be dismissed for failure to state a claim unless it appears beyond doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of his claim which would entitle him to relief"

Holding that ERISA fiduciaries may have duties to disclose information about plan prospects that they have no duty, or even power, to change

Holding that relief under section 502 is limited to remedies traditionally available in equity, such as injunctions, mandamus, and restitution

Holding portion of beneficiary's settlement constituted specifically identifiable funds subject to equitable lien

Holding that the plaintiff's "claims that the defendants falsely represented that their drugs had been ‘properly approved by the FDA’ must fail"

Holding that Title VII does not provide a remedy when both sexes are treated badly because Title VII is predicated on discrimination

Holding widow beneficiary satisfied detrimental reliance element where she and employee husband refused supplemental insurance under plan due to misrepresentation

Holding that "reinstatement, as a genera] equitable concept, is within the range of redress permitted," and remanding for inquiry into whether reinstatement of the parties to the pre-election status quo was appropriate

Holding that "restitutionary reimbursement of back benefits" is form of equitable relief available under § 502

Finding that Hopper held that not every regulatory violation is a "knowingly false statement" and distinguishing this holding from a materiality requirement

Holding party seeking fees may additionally seek "nontaxable expenses"

Holding liable "[a]ny administrator" who fails to provide documents in a timely manner