Memorandum in Opposition re MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint for Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief Can Be Granted Memorandum of Points and Authorities & Certificate of Service
Holding that the district court erred in granting a motion to dismiss "by relying on extrinsic evidence and by taking judicial notice of disputed matters of fact to support its ruling"
107 Cal.App.4th 454 (Cal. Ct. App. 2003) Cited 104 times
Noting that one of the elements of negligent misrepresentation is that the "representation must have been made with the intent to induce plaintiff to rely upon it"
6 Cal.App.4th 793 (Cal. Ct. App. 1992) Cited 53 times
Holding that the plaintiff could not recover for emotional distress based on his employer's negligent misrepresentations regarding employment benefits and reasoning that "[w]hile damage as a result of employee's reliance on [employer's] negligent misrepresentations could be anticipated, nothing in the case suggests the peculiarly sensitive emotional trauma foreseeable in such cases as Allen v. Jones or Molien"