§Why CasetextPricing

Fuentes v. Kroenke Sports & Entertainment, LLC

REPLY to Response to 21 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim

21 Cited authorities

  1. Ashcroft v. Iqbal

    556 U.S. 662 (2009)   Cited 252,377 times   279 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a claim is plausible where a plaintiff's allegations enable the court to draw a "reasonable inference" the defendant is liable

  2. Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Envtl. Servs. (TOC), Inc.

    528 U.S. 167 (2000)   Cited 7,141 times   25 Legal Analyses
    Holding that plaintiffs who curtailed their recreational activities on a river due to reasonable concerns about the effect of pollutant discharges into that river had standing

  3. Dodd v. United States

    545 U.S. 353 (2005)   Cited 1,375 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that limitations periods under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act begin on the date the right is recognized, not on the date it is made retroactively applicable

  4. Resnick v. Avmed, Inc.

    693 F.3d 1317 (11th Cir. 2012)   Cited 445 times   18 Legal Analyses
    Holding plaintiffs need only allege losses, not unreimbursed losses, for a cognizable injury in a Florida breach of implied contract claim

  5. Tandy v. City of Wichita

    380 F.3d 1277 (10th Cir. 2004)   Cited 311 times
    Holding that several plaintiffs who rode the Wichita bus system once could have standing

  6. Hancock v. Am. Tel. & Tel. Co.

    701 F.3d 1248 (10th Cir. 2012)   Cited 205 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding internet agreement valid under Florida and Oklahoma law where process gave customer opportunity to review internet terms in scrolling text box; customer had to click an “I Agree” button to manifest assent to internet terms in order to continue with registration process and activation of internet service

  7. Hall v. Walter

    969 P.2d 224 (Colo. 1998)   Cited 186 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, when certain requirements are met, non-consumers have standing to maintain privatecause of action under Colorado Consumer Protection Act

  8. Edwards v. the First American Corp.

    385 F. App'x 629 (9th Cir. 2010)   Cited 106 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a statutory violation alone is enough

  9. Wimberly v. Ettenberg

    194 Colo. 163 (Colo. 1977)   Cited 179 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the plaintiffs' “[i]ndirect and incidental pecuniary injury” was insufficient to confer standing

  10. HealthOne of Denver, Inc. v. Unitedhealth Grp. Inc.

    805 F. Supp. 2d 1115 (D. Colo. 2011)   Cited 57 times
    In HealthONE of Denver, Inc. v. UnitedHealth Group Inc., 805 F. Supp. 2d at 1118, the plaintiffs brought a CCPA claim against the defendant for its use of a mark that incorporated the entirety of the plaintiffs' own mark.

  11. Rule 9 - Pleading Special Matters

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 9   Cited 38,894 times   316 Legal Analyses
    Permitting "[m]alice, intent, knowledge, and other conditions of a person's mind [to] be alleged generally"

  12. Section 6-1-718 - Ticket sales and resales - prohibitions - unlawful conditions - definitions

    Colo. Rev. Stat. § 6-1-718   Cited 1 times

    (1) As used in this section, unless the context otherwise requires: (a) "Operator" means a person or entity who owns, operates, or controls a place of entertainment or who promotes or produces entertainment and that sells a ticket to an event for original sale, including an employee of such person or entity. (b) "Original sale" means the first sale of a ticket by an operator. (c) "Place of entertainment" means a public or private entertainment facility, such as a stadium, arena, racetrack, museum