§Why CasetextPricing

Freecycle Network, Inc. v. Oey et al

REPLY to Response to Motion re MOTION for Preliminary Injunction Notice and Motion for Preliminary Injunction

20 Cited authorities

  1. Granny Goose Foods, Inc. v. Teamsters

    415 U.S. 423 (1974)   Cited 2,114 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that union could not be held in contempt of restraining order

  2. Va. Pharmacy Bd. v. Va. Consumer Council

    425 U.S. 748 (1976)   Cited 1,730 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding society and consumers both have a strong interest "in the free flow of commercial information"

  3. Madsen v. Women's Health Center, Inc.

    512 U.S. 753 (1994)   Cited 636 times
    Holding that an injunction against anti-abortion protesters was not viewpoint discriminatory because "none of the restrictions imposed by the court were directed at the contents of petitioner's message."

  4. Lockheed Martin. v. Network Solutions

    194 F.3d 980 (9th Cir. 1999)   Cited 628 times
    Holding that the court must consider “the extent of control exercised by the defendant over the third party's means of infringement”

  5. Goto.com, Inc. v. Walt Disney Co.

    202 F.3d 1199 (9th Cir. 2000)   Cited 562 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that marks were "strikingly similar" when considered with colors as used in commerce despite PTO's determination that they were not confusingly similar based on black and white submission

  6. In re Primus

    436 U.S. 412 (1978)   Cited 296 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that where a state seeks to infringe upon a party’s First Amendment freedom of association, the state must justify that infringement with "a subordinating interest which is compelling" and must use means that are "closely drawn to avoid unnecessary abridgment of associational freedoms"

  7. Friedman v. Rogers

    440 U.S. 1 (1979)   Cited 272 times
    Holding that the trade name of an optometrist was commercial speech

  8. Rent-A-Center v. Canyon Television Appliance

    944 F.2d 597 (9th Cir. 1991)   Cited 413 times
    Holding that intangible injuries, such as damage to advertising efforts and goodwill, can be irreparable harm for purpose of a preliminary injunction

  9. Cairns v. Franklin Mint Co.

    292 F.3d 1139 (9th Cir. 2002)   Cited 283 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the sale of collectibles bearing the name and likeness of Princess Diana was a nominative fair use

  10. Johnson v. California State Bd. of Account

    72 F.3d 1427 (9th Cir. 1995)   Cited 308 times
    Stating that "even if the balance of hardships tips decidedly in favor of the moving party, it must be shown as an irreducible minimum that there is a fair chance of success on the merits"

  11. Rule 65 - Injunctions and Restraining Orders

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 65   Cited 22,415 times   87 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing court's ability to enter emergency order with less than full adversary hearing and even, in appropriate circumstances, without notice

  12. Section 1125 - False designations of origin, false descriptions, and dilution forbidden

    15 U.S.C. § 1125   Cited 15,276 times   320 Legal Analyses
    Holding "the person who asserts trade dress protection has the burden of proving that the matter sought to be protected is not functional"