Lujan v. Defs. of Wildlife

Holding that the elements of standing "must be supported in the same way as any other matter on which the plaintiff bears the burden of proof"

United States v. Salerno

Holding that "extensive safeguards" are necessary "to repel a facial challenge"

Lingle v. Chevron U. S. A.

Holding that a substantive due process inquiry has "no proper place" in Takings doctrine, while distinguishing Nollan and Dolan as a special application of unconstitutional conditions doctrine for Takings

Abbott Laboratories v. Gardner

Holding that plaintiffs subject to a regulation had standing to challenge it even though the Attorney General had yet to "authorize criminal and seizure actions for violations of the statute"

Hartford Underwriters Ins. Co. v. Unionplanters Bank

Holding that § 1109(b) was "by its terms inapplicable" in case which had been "converted from Chapter 11 to Chapter 7"

Chicago v. Morales

Holding that vagueness that "fails to establish standards for the police and public that are sufficient to guard against the arbitrary deprivation of liberty interests" is subject to facial challenge

Penn Central Transp. Co. v. New York City

Holding prohibition on construction of fifty-five-story office tower over New York's Grand Central Terminal is not a regulatory taking

Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency

Holding it “inappropriate to treat cases involving physical takings as controlling precedents for the evaluation of a claim that there has been a ‘regulatory taking,’ and vice versa”

Thomas v. Union Carbide Agric. Products Co.

Holding that a challenge to a statutory system of arbitration was ripe because the plaintiffs' "injury [was] not a function of whether the [arbitration] tribunal awards reasonable compensation but of the tribunal's authority to adjudicate the dispute"

Duke Power Co. v. Carolina Env. Study Group

Holding that "a ‘but for’ causal connection" between plaintiff's injury and defendant's act sufficed for traceability

Section 101 - Definitions

Defining "securities clearing agency" by reference to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Section 109 - Who may be a debtor

Allowing municipal bankruptcy only if specifically authorized by state law

Section 1141 - Effect of confirmation

Granting discharge to Chapter 11 debtor upon confirmation except as otherwise provided for in the plan

Section 103 - Applicability of chapters

Providing that "chapters 1, 3, and 5 . . . [shall] apply in a case under chapter 7, 11, 12, or 13"

Section 364 - Obtaining credit

Granting bankruptcy courts authority to afford superpriority status to post-petition borrowings when the debtor is unable to obtain unsecured credit

Section 525 - Protection against discriminatory treatment

Prohibiting certain Government grant and loan programs from discriminating against applicants who are or have been bankrupt

Section 528 - Requirements for debt relief agencies

In section 528(b), "advertisement of bankruptcy assistance" is defined as "an advertisement, directed to the general public, indicating that the debt relief agency provides assistance with respect to credit defaults, mortgage foreclosures, eviction proceedings, excessive debt, debt collection pressure, or inability to pay any consumer debt."

Section 734 - United States laws extended to Puerto Rico; internal revenue receipts covered into treasury

Stating that, unless other-wise specified, federal statutes applicable to states apply to Puerto Rico

Section 731 - Territory included under name Puerto Rico

Section 903 - Reservation of State power to control municipalities

Providing that "a State law prescribing a method of composition of indebtedness of such municipality may not bind any creditor that does not consent to such composition"