§Why CasetextPricing

Franciscan Alliance, Inc. et al v. Burwell et al

Brief/Memorandum in Support

85 Cited authorities

  1. Washington v. Glucksberg

    521 U.S. 702 (1997)   Cited 2,633 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that there is no fundamental right to physician-assisted suicide

  2. U.S. v. Williams

    553 U.S. 285 (2008)   Cited 1,604 times   10 Legal Analyses
    Holding that solicitation is "categorically excluded from First Amendment protection"

  3. Holt v. Hobbs

    574 U.S. 352 (2015)   Cited 1,103 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding beard searches address prison's safety concerns in context of religious discrimination claim under the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000 ("RLUIPA")

  4. City of Boerne v. Flores

    521 U.S. 507 (1997)   Cited 1,800 times   21 Legal Analyses
    Holding that RFRA is unconstitutional in so far as it permits suits against state actors

  5. Elrod v. Burns

    427 U.S. 347 (1976)   Cited 4,217 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that local government could not constitutionally base public employment opportunities on political affiliation or nonaffiliation

  6. Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates

    455 U.S. 489 (1982)   Cited 3,178 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the possible inhibition of a constitutional right is "perhaps the most important factor"

  7. Obergefell v. Hodges

    576 U.S. 644 (2015)   Cited 848 times   60 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Fourteenth Amendment protects the right of same-sex couples to marry in light of doctrinal developments, as well as fundamentally changed social understanding

  8. Grayned v. City of Rockford

    408 U.S. 104 (1972)   Cited 4,712 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a statute's words, even when "marked by flexibility and reasonable breadth, rather than meticulous specificity," are clear based on "what the ordinance as a whole prohibits"

  9. Roe v. Wade

    410 U.S. 113 (1973)   Cited 4,089 times   26 Legal Analyses
    Holding that end of pregnancy did not moot the case because the plaintiff was capable of becoming pregnant again

  10. Knox v. Serv. Employees Int'l Union

    567 U.S. 298 (2012)   Cited 809 times   15 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a post-certiorari offer to class members to fully refund the collection of disputed union dues did not moot the case

  11. Section 2000e-2 - Unlawful employment practices

    42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2   Cited 28,256 times   170 Legal Analyses
    Adopting case law prior to June 4, 1989, “with respect to the concept of ‘alternative employment practice’ ”

  12. Section 706 - Scope of review

    5 U.S.C. § 706   Cited 20,433 times   184 Legal Analyses
    Granting courts jurisdiction to "compel agency action unlawfully held or unreasonably delayed"

  13. Section 794 - Nondiscrimination under Federal grants and programs

    29 U.S.C. § 794   Cited 12,309 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Adopting ADA standards for Rehabilitation Act claims

  14. Section 1681 - Sex

    20 U.S.C. § 1681   Cited 4,365 times   79 Legal Analyses
    Referencing application of Title IX prohibitions to school admissions

  15. Section 1395 - Prohibition against any Federal interference

    42 U.S.C. § 1395   Cited 2,265 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Addressing Medicare's reimbursement for diagnostic laboratory services for hospital outpatients

  16. Section 2000bb-1 - Free exercise of religion protected

    42 U.S.C. § 2000bb-1   Cited 1,118 times   27 Legal Analyses
    Providing for "appropriate relief" in judicial suit

  17. Section 249 - Hate crime acts

    18 U.S.C. § 249   Cited 296 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Criminalizing violence because of "gender, sexual orientation"

  18. Section 18116 - Nondiscrimination

    42 U.S.C. § 18116   Cited 281 times   15 Legal Analyses
    Granting the HHS Secretary power to promulgate Section 1557's implementing regulations through notice and comment

  19. Section 6101 - Statement of purpose

    42 U.S.C. § 6101   Cited 268 times   7 Legal Analyses

    It is the purpose of this chapter to prohibit discrimination on the basis of age in programs or activities receiving Federal financial assistance. 42 U.S.C. § 6101 Pub. L. 94-135, title III, §302, Nov. 28, 1975, 89 Stat. 728; Pub. L. 95-478, title IV, §401(a), Oct. 18, 1978, 92 Stat. 1555; Pub. L. 99-272, title XIV, §14001(b)(4), Apr. 7, 1986, 100 Stat. 329. EDITORIAL NOTES AMENDMENTS1986- Pub. L. 99-272 struck out ", including programs or activities receiving funds under the State and Local Fiscal

  20. Section 300a-7 - Sterilization or abortion

    42 U.S.C. § 300a-7   Cited 53 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Prohibiting discrimination against abortion providers in the decision whether the grant admitting privileges

  21. Section 1604.2 - Sex as a bona fide occupational qualification

    29 C.F.R. § 1604.2   Cited 54 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Stating that protective laws for women "conflict with and are superseded by [T]itle VII"

  22. Section 92.4 - Assurances

    45 C.F.R. § 92.4   Cited 22 times   5 Legal Analyses

    (a)Assurances. An entity applying for Federal financial assistance to which this part applies shall, as a condition of any application for Federal financial assistance, submit an assurance, on a form specified by the Director of the Department's Office for Civil Rights, that the entity's health programs or activities will be operated in compliance with section 1557 and this part. A health insurance issuer seeking certification to participate in an Exchange or a State seeking approval to operate a

  23. Section 92.101 - Meaningful access for individuals with limited English proficiency

    45 C.F.R. § 92.101   Cited 10 times   1 Legal Analyses

    (a) Any entity operating or administering a health program or activity subject to this part shall take reasonable steps to ensure meaningful access to such programs or activities by limited English proficient individuals. (b)Specific applications- (1) Enforcement discretion. In evaluating whether any entity to which paragraph (a) of this section applies has complied with paragraph (a) of this section, the Director of the Department's Office for Civil Rights may assess how such entity balances the