§Why CasetextPricing

FotoMedia Technologies, LLC v. American Greetings, Corp. et al

MOTION to Dismiss without prejudice or, in the alternative, to stay pending reexamination

10 Cited authorities

  1. Gould v. Control Laser Corp.

    705 F.2d 1340 (Fed. Cir. 1983)   Cited 308 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the stay of a district court patent proceeding pending reexamination of the patent in the Patent and Trademark Office was not "for such a protracted or indefinite period as to render its issuance an abuse of discretion"

  2. Soverain Software LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc.

    356 F. Supp. 2d 660 (E.D. Tex. 2005)   Cited 130 times
    Denying stay

  3. Datatreasury Corp. v. Wells Fargo Co.

    490 F. Supp. 2d 749 (E.D. Tex. 2006)   Cited 34 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Granting stay

  4. Middleton, Inc. v. Minnesota Mining Manufacturing Co.

    No. 4:03-cv-40493 (S.D. Iowa Aug. 24, 2004)   Cited 35 times
    Granting motion to stay proceedings eight years after start of litigation and less than two months before trial

  5. GPAC, Inc. v. D.W.W. Enterprises, Inc.

    144 F.R.D. 60 (D.N.J. 1992)   Cited 54 times
    Finding a case pending for 16 months where the parties had exchanged and answered interrogatories and where four depositions had been taken was still in the early stages of litigation

  6. Walter Kidde v. Universal

    479 F.3d 1330 (Fed. Cir. 2007)   Cited 30 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding that the district court erred when it granted the plaintiffs motion to dismiss under Rule 41 without first resolving its subject matter jurisdiction concerns

  7. Broadcast Innovation, L.L.C. v. Charter Communications, Inc.

    Civil Action No. 03-cv-2223-ABJ-BNB (D. Colo. Jul. 11, 2006)   Cited 6 times

    Civil Action No. 03-cv-2223-ABJ-BNB. July 11, 2006 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR STAY PENDING REEXAMINATION OF U.S. PATENT 6,076,094 BY UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ALAN JOHNSON, District Judge The above-captioned matter comes before the Court on Defendant Charter Communications, Inc.'s Motion to Stay Pending Reexamination of the U.S. Patent 6,076,094 By United States Patent and Trademark Office. Plaintiffs Broadcast Innovation, LLC and IO Research Pty, Ltd. have resisted this

  8. Rule 41 - Dismissal of Actions

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 41   Cited 112,111 times   198 Legal Analyses
    Holding that such dismissal "operates as an adjudication on the merits"

  9. Rule 26 - Duty to Disclose; General Provisions Governing Discovery

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 26   Cited 97,825 times   674 Legal Analyses
    Adopting Fed.R.Civ.P. 37

  10. Rule 5 - Serving and Filing Pleadings and Other Papers

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 5   Cited 22,753 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Allowing service by filing papers with the court's electronic-filing system