§Why CasetextPricing

FotoMedia Technologies, LLC v. American Greetings, Corp. et al

MOTION to Dismiss without prejudice or, in the alternative, to stay pending reexamination

10 Cited authorities

  1. Gould v. Control Laser Corp.

    705 F.2d 1340 (Fed. Cir. 1983)   Cited 312 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the stay of a district court patent proceeding pending reexamination of the patent in the Patent and Trademark Office was not "for such a protracted or indefinite period as to render its issuance an abuse of discretion"

  2. Soverain Software LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc.

    356 F. Supp. 2d 660 (E.D. Tex. 2005)   Cited 130 times
    Denying stay

  3. Datatreasury Corp. v. Wells Fargo Co.

    490 F. Supp. 2d 749 (E.D. Tex. 2006)   Cited 34 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Granting stay

  4. Walter Kidde v. Universal

    479 F.3d 1330 (Fed. Cir. 2007)   Cited 32 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding that the district court erred when it granted the plaintiffs motion to dismiss under Rule 41 without first resolving its subject matter jurisdiction concerns

  5. Middleton, Inc. v. Minnesota Mining Manufacturing Co.

    No. 4:03-cv-40493 (S.D. Iowa Aug. 24, 2004)   Cited 35 times
    Granting motion to stay proceedings eight years after start of litigation and less than two months before trial

  6. GPAC, Inc. v. D.W.W. Enterprises, Inc.

    144 F.R.D. 60 (D.N.J. 1992)   Cited 54 times
    Finding a case pending for 16 months where the parties had exchanged and answered interrogatories and where four depositions had been taken was still in the early stages of litigation

  7. Broadcast Innovation, L.L.C. v. Charter Communications, Inc.

    Civil Action No. 03-cv-2223-ABJ-BNB (D. Colo. Jul. 11, 2006)   Cited 6 times

    Civil Action No. 03-cv-2223-ABJ-BNB. July 11, 2006 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR STAY PENDING REEXAMINATION OF U.S. PATENT 6,076,094 BY UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ALAN JOHNSON, District Judge The above-captioned matter comes before the Court on Defendant Charter Communications, Inc.'s Motion to Stay Pending Reexamination of the U.S. Patent 6,076,094 By United States Patent and Trademark Office. Plaintiffs Broadcast Innovation, LLC and IO Research Pty, Ltd. have resisted this

  8. Rule 41 - Dismissal of Actions

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 41   Cited 118,170 times   203 Legal Analyses
    Holding that such dismissal "operates as an adjudication on the merits"

  9. Rule 26 - Duty to Disclose; General Provisions Governing Discovery

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 26   Cited 102,163 times   702 Legal Analyses
    Adopting Fed.R.Civ.P. 37

  10. Rule 5 - Serving and Filing Pleadings and Other Papers

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 5   Cited 23,925 times   18 Legal Analyses
    Providing for service via CM/ECF Systems