§Why CasetextPricing

Forest Laboratories Inc. et al v. Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Inc. et al

MOTION for Extension of Time to Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to Take Jurisdictional Discovery and to Extend Their Time to Respond to Synthon's Motion to Dismiss -

14 Cited authorities

  1. Toys “R” Us, Inc. v. Step Two, S.A.

    318 F.3d 446 (3d Cir. 2003)   Cited 1,027 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that two sales initiated by the plaintiff cannot establish personal jurisdiction

  2. MSL at Andover, Inc. v. American Bar Ass'n

    107 F.3d 1026 (3d Cir. 1997)   Cited 299 times
    Holding Noerr gave immunity for any damages stemming from state adoption of requirements for bar admission to petitioners who lobbied for their adoption

  3. Compagnie Des Bauxites De Guinee v. L'Union Atlantique S.A. D'Assurances

    723 F.2d 357 (3d Cir. 1983)   Cited 179 times
    Holding that the district court's closing of discovery in the prior proceeding prevented the plaintiff from having "had an opportunity to fully litigate the issue"

  4. Applied Biosystems, Inc. v. Cruachem, Ltd.

    772 F. Supp. 1458 (D. Del. 1991)   Cited 133 times
    Holding that subsection (c) of the long-arm statute “requires that some act must have actually occurred in Delaware”

  5. Hansen v. Neumueller GmbH

    163 F.R.D. 471 (D. Del. 1995)   Cited 106 times
    Recognizing that "Fed.R.Civ.P. 26 permits liberal discovery of any facts which are relevant and not privileged" and further recognizing that "[t]his rule also applies where the plaintiff seeks discovery to establish personal jurisdiction"

  6. Joint Stock Soc. v. Heublein, Inc.

    936 F. Supp. 177 (D. Del. 1996)   Cited 56 times
    Holding that the court must accept as true all well-pled facts

  7. Pfizer Inc. v. Holding

    386 F. Supp. 2d 666 (M.D.N.C. 2005)   Cited 11 times
    Holding that patent infringement claim stemming from ANDA filing arose where ANDA was prepared and submitted, finding that "this claim will involve substantial inquiry into the product itself as described in the ANDA, and the focus of that inquiry will involve the work related to the preparation of the ANDA"

  8. Williams v. Potter

    384 F. Supp. 2d 730 (D. Del. 2005)   Cited 11 times
    Holding that "[v]ague and conclusory factual allegations" do not comply with Rule 8

  9. Anderson v. McIntosh Inn

    No. CIV.A.02-1262-JJF (D. Del. Mar. 28, 2003)   Cited 7 times
    Finding that plaintiff could not establish pretext in race discrimination case where his "evidence consists of general allegations of Defendant's discriminatory motives based on hearsay and personal beliefs not predicated on actual knowledge and wholly unsupported by the record"

  10. Adams v. Sheldon

    Civ. Action No. 04-251-JJF (D. Del. Oct. 5, 2007)

    Civ. Action No. 04-251-JJF. October 5, 2007 Ashley Adams, Pro se Plaintiff, Newark, Delaware. Beth H. Christman, Esquire, Casarino, Christman Shalk, P.A., Wilmington, Delaware. Attorney for Defendant, Jo Ellen Chapin Sheldon. MEMORANDUM OPINION JOSEPH FARNAN JR., District JudgePage 1 Presently before the Court are Defendant's Motion For Summary Judgment (D.I. 79), Plaintiff's Motion To Deny/Dismiss Defendant's Motion For Summary Judgment (D.I. 84), Plaintiff's Motion For Enlargement Of Time For Response

  11. Rule 6 - Computing and Extending Time; Time for Motion Papers

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 6   Cited 50,999 times   24 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "if the last day [of a period] is a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday, the period continues to run until the end of the next day that is not a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday."

  12. Section 271 - Infringement of patent

    35 U.S.C. § 271   Cited 6,144 times   1082 Legal Analyses
    Holding that testing is a "use"

  13. Section 355 - New drugs

    21 U.S.C. § 355   Cited 2,275 times   354 Legal Analyses
    Granting the court discretion to change the date on which an ANDA may be approved if "either party to the action failed to reasonably cooperate in expediting the action"