40 Cited authorities

  1. Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly

    550 U.S. 544 (2007)   Cited 209,562 times   342 Legal Analyses
    Holding that conclusory allegations that the defendants acted unlawfully were insufficient to state a claim
  2. Korea Supply Co. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.

    29 Cal.4th 1134 (Cal. 2003)   Cited 1,433 times   15 Legal Analyses
    Holding that plaintiff cannot recover damages under Cal. Bus. Prof. Code § 17200 unless plaintiff has "an ownership interest in the money it seeks to recover"
  3. Minter v. Prime Equipment Co.

    451 F.3d 1196 (10th Cir. 2006)   Cited 1,261 times
    Holding that "denial of leave to amend is appropriate when the party filing the motion has no adequate explanation for the delay"
  4. TV Communications Network, Inc. v. ESPN, Inc.

    767 F. Supp. 1062 (D. Colo. 1991)   Cited 1,008 times

    Civ. A. No. 90-F-864. April 5, 1991. Daniel L. Brotzman, Englewood, Colo., Eric Ross, TCVN, Inc., Denver, Colo., for plaintiff. Edwin Durso, Gen. Counsel, ESPN, Inc., New York City, for defendant ESPN, Inc. Frederick T. Davis, Jeffrey M. Zimmerman, Patterson, Belknap, Webb Tyler, New York City, Frederick J. Baumann, Paul J. Zylstra, Rothgerber, Appel, Powers Johnson, Denver, Colo., for defendants ESPN, Inc. and Capital Cities/ABC, Inc. Robert E. Youle, Brian G. Eberle, Sherman Howard, Denver, Colo

  5. Viernow v. Euripides Development Corp.

    157 F.3d 785 (10th Cir. 1998)   Cited 252 times
    Holding plaintiff cannot "salvage a lost case by untimely suggestion of new theories of recovery" and court need not grant motion to amend which would create "moving target"
  6. Pallottino v. City of Rio Rancho

    31 F.3d 1023 (10th Cir. 1994)   Cited 272 times
    Holding that untimeliness in itself can be a sufficient reason to deny leave to amend
  7. Hayes v. Whitman

    264 F.3d 1017 (10th Cir. 2001)   Cited 187 times
    Holding that “[b]ecause review of Plaintiffs' claim is available under the Clean Water Act, it is not subject to review under the APA”
  8. Simpson v. Univ. of Colo.

    220 F.R.D. 354 (D. Colo. 2004)   Cited 174 times
    Finding party certainly entitled to discovery of any relevant matters bearing on claims and defenses
  9. Chavez v. Young America Insurance Company

    Civil Action No. 06-cv-02419-PSF-BNB (D. Colo. Mar. 2, 2007)   Cited 158 times
    Denying unopposed motion to stay
  10. Commodity Fut. Trading v. Chilcott Portfolio

    713 F.2d 1477 (10th Cir. 1983)   Cited 262 times
    Holding that "[t]he ruling on the stay involved an exercise of discretion, and [that the Tenth Circuit] focuse on the question whether the appellants have carried the weighty burden of showing an abuse of discretion"
  11. Rule 12 - Defenses and Objections: When and How Presented; Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; Consolidating Motions; Waiving Defenses; Pretrial Hearing

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 12   Cited 267,561 times   779 Legal Analyses
    Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss
  12. Section 1332 - Diversity of citizenship; amount in controversy; costs

    28 U.S.C. § 1332   Cited 92,248 times   546 Legal Analyses
    Holding district court has jurisdiction over action between diverse citizens "where the matter in controversy exceeds the sum or value of $75,000"
  13. Section 1331 - Federal question

    28 U.S.C. § 1331   Cited 83,937 times   110 Legal Analyses
    Finding that in order to invoke federal question jurisdiction, a plaintiff's claims must arise "under the Constitution, laws, or treaties of the United States."
  14. Rule 26 - Duty to Disclose; General Provisions Governing Discovery

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 26   Cited 71,273 times   538 Legal Analyses
    Adopting Fed.R.Civ.P. 37
  15. Rule 15 - Amended and Supplemental Pleadings

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 15   Cited 70,582 times   88 Legal Analyses
    Finding that, per N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 1024, New York law provides a more forgiving principle for relation back in the context of naming John Doe defendants described with particularity in the complaint
  16. Section 1391 - Venue generally

    28 U.S.C. § 1391   Cited 22,250 times   187 Legal Analyses
    Finding that venue lies where a "substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim" occurred
  17. Rule 702 - Testimony by Expert Witnesses

    Fed. R. Evid. 702   Cited 21,133 times   183 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing that "scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge" may assist the trier of fact
  18. Section 17200 - Unfair competition defined

    Cal. Bus. and Prof'l. Code § 17200   Cited 14,802 times   277 Legal Analyses
    Prohibiting unlawful business practices
  19. Rule 30 - Depositions by Oral Examination

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 30   Cited 12,159 times   99 Legal Analyses
    Upholding a district court's decision not to consider the plaintiff's deposition errata sheets in opposition to a motion for summary judgment when they were untimely
  20. Rule 1 - Scope and Purpose

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 1   Cited 11,153 times   39 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing that the Rules of Civil Procedure "should be construed, administered, and employed by the court and the parties to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action and proceeding."