23 Cited authorities

Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.
477 U.S. 242 (1986) Cited 236,174 times 38 Legal Analyses
Holding that summary judgment is not appropriate if "the dispute about a material fact is ‘genuine,’ that is, if the evidence is such that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party"
Celotex Corp. v. Catrett
477 U.S. 317 (1986) Cited 216,278 times 40 Legal Analyses
Holding that a movant's summary judgment motion should be granted "against a [nonmovant] who fails to make a showing sufficient to establish the existence of an element essential to that party's case, and on which that party will bear the burden of proof at trial"
Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
509 U.S. 579 (1993) Cited 26,284 times 225 Legal Analyses
Holding that a trial judge must ensure that all admitted expert testimony "is not only relevant, but reliable"
Hunt v. Cromartie
526 U.S. 541 (1999) Cited 2,876 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that the court must resolve all reasonable inferences and doubts in the nonmoving party's favor and construe all evidence in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party
In re Paoli R.R. Yard PCB Litigation
35 F.3d 717 (3d Cir. 1994) Cited 2,110 times 8 Legal Analyses
Holding an expert's testimony unreliable because he did not consider alternative causes
Wishkin v. Potter
476 F.3d 180 (3d Cir. 2007) Cited 1,078 times 1 Legal Analyses
Finding the statute applies to USPS employees
Boyle v. County of Allegheny Pennsylvania
139 F.3d 386 (3d Cir. 1998) Cited 1,374 times
In Boyle, we held that testimony by two out of three members of a hiring authority stating that a position did not require political affiliation created a genuine issue of material fact as to whether the position was a policymaking one.
Schneider ex Rel. Estate of Schneider v. Fried
320 F.3d 396 (3d Cir. 2003) Cited 705 times
Holding that Rule 6(b) "clearly forbids a district court from extending" the period in Rule 59(b)
Oddi v. Ford Motor Co.
234 F.3d 136 (3d Cir. 2000) Cited 609 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that a record consisting of a preliminary report, an amended report, an affidavit prepared to meet the adversary's Daubert challenge, and multiple depositions was sufficient to obviate the need for a Daubert hearing
Ideal Dairy Farms, Inc. v. Labatt
90 F.3d 737 (3d Cir. 1996) Cited 356 times
Holding plaintiffs must present evidence from which rational person could conclude the relevant markets are actually what plaintiffs allege them to be
Rule 56 - Summary Judgment
Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 Cited 328,681 times 158 Legal Analyses
Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit
Rule 702 - Testimony by Expert Witnesses
Fed. R. Evid. 702 Cited 26,655 times 255 Legal Analyses
Adopting the Daubert standard
Section 2A:58C-2 - Liability of manufacturer or seller in product liability action
N.J. Stat. § 2A:58C-2 Cited 282 times 4 Legal Analyses
Establishing elements for prima facie cause of action under New Jersey Products Liability Act

Ford et al v. Ford Motor Company et al

23 Cited authorities

Holding that summary judgment is not appropriate if "the dispute about a material fact is ‘genuine,’ that is, if the evidence is such that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party"

Holding that a movant's summary judgment motion should be granted "against a [nonmovant] who fails to make a showing sufficient to establish the existence of an element essential to that party's case, and on which that party will bear the burden of proof at trial"

Holding that a trial judge must ensure that all admitted expert testimony "is not only relevant, but reliable"

Holding that the court must resolve all reasonable inferences and doubts in the nonmoving party's favor and construe all evidence in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party

Holding an expert's testimony unreliable because he did not consider alternative causes

Finding the statute applies to USPS employees

In Boyle, we held that testimony by two out of three members of a hiring authority stating that a position did not require political affiliation created a genuine issue of material fact as to whether the position was a policymaking one.

Holding that Rule 6(b) "clearly forbids a district court from extending" the period in Rule 59(b)

Holding that a record consisting of a preliminary report, an amended report, an affidavit prepared to meet the adversary's Daubert challenge, and multiple depositions was sufficient to obviate the need for a Daubert hearing

Holding plaintiffs must present evidence from which rational person could conclude the relevant markets are actually what plaintiffs allege them to be

Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit

Adopting the Daubert standard

Establishing elements for prima facie cause of action under New Jersey Products Liability Act