§Why CasetextPricing

Flynn v. Sony Electronics, Inc. et al

REPLY in Support re MOTION for Reconsideration re Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief, 59 Order, MOTION for Reconsideration re Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief, 59 Order, Set Hearings

8 Cited authorities

  1. United States v. LoRusso

    695 F.2d 45 (2d Cir. 1982)   Cited 140 times
    Holding that trial court's decision to charge the jury on a lesser offense "was well within the court's authority and was properly designed to ensure the just determination of the charges brought against these defendants"

  2. Gaskell v. Weir

    10 F.3d 626 (9th Cir. 1993)   Cited 52 times
    Finding that sanctioned attorney's vague statements about his finances insufficient to meet that burden

  3. U.S. v. Raymond

    516 F.3d 553 (7th Cir. 2008)   Cited 29 times
    Holding that submitting a document electronically instead of on paper as required by local rules was a “mere error of form”

  4. Martin v. County of San Diego

    650 F. Supp. 2d 1094 (S.D. Cal. 2009)   Cited 26 times
    Holding § 52.1(j) "explicitly provides that violence is a required element where the 'threat, intimidation or coercion' is based purely upon a defendant's statements"

  5. Darouiche v. Fidelity Nat. Ins. Co.

    415 F. App'x 548 (5th Cir. 2011)   Cited 14 times
    In Darouiche v. Fidelity National Insurance Company, 415 F. App'x 548 (5th Cir. 2011), the Fifth Circuit held that even though the plaintiff's Rule 59 motion for a new trial was filed on the last day of the 28-day period and was subsequently marked as deficient, his motion was timely for the purposes of Rule 59.

  6. Enercon GmbH v. Erdman

    13 F. App'x 651 (9th Cir. 2001)   Cited 1 times

    13 Fed.Appx. 651 (9th Cir. 2001) ENERCON GMBH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. William J. ERDMAN; Bruce Carrier; Robert M. Zavadil; James J. Eisen; Electrotek Concepts, Inc.; Kenetech Corporation, Defendants-Appellees. No. 00-15399. D.C. No. CV-96-20923-RMW/EAI. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. July 11, 2001 Argued and Submitted June 13, 2001. NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3) Motion was made for sanctions under Rule 11. The United States District Court

  7. Rule 60 - Relief from a Judgment or Order

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 60   Cited 53,581 times   146 Legal Analyses
    Granting relief from the operation of a judgment

  8. Rule 5 - Serving and Filing Pleadings and Other Papers

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 5   Cited 22,038 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Allowing service by filing papers with the court's electronic-filing system