68 Cited authorities

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.

    477 U.S. 242 (1986)   Cited 236,991 times   38 Legal Analyses
    Holding that summary judgment is not appropriate if "the dispute about a material fact is ‘genuine,’ that is, if the evidence is such that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party"
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett

    477 U.S. 317 (1986)   Cited 216,978 times   40 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a movant's summary judgment motion should be granted "against a [nonmovant] who fails to make a showing sufficient to establish the existence of an element essential to that party's case, and on which that party will bear the burden of proof at trial"
  3. Matsushita Elec. Indus. Co. v. Zenith Radio

    475 U.S. 574 (1986)   Cited 113,466 times   38 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, on summary judgment, antitrust plaintiffs "must show that the inference of conspiracy is reasonable in light of the competing inferences of independent action or collusive action that could not have harmed" them
  4. District of Columbia et al. v. Heller

    554 U.S. 570 (2008)   Cited 3,558 times   50 Legal Analyses
    Holding it irrelevant to the constitutionality of D.C.'s "handgun" ban that the law allowed citizens the possession of substitutes, like "long guns"
  5. Beard v. Banks

    548 U.S. 521 (2006)   Cited 1,697 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that encouraging progress toward rehabilitation serves legitimate penological objectives
  6. Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.

    397 U.S. 137 (1970)   Cited 1,699 times   27 Legal Analyses
    Holding that where a statute addresses "a legitimate local public interest, and its effects on interstate commerce are only incidental, it will be upheld unless the burden imposed on such commerce is clearly excessive in relation to the putative local benefits"
  7. Central Va. Comm. College v. Katz

    546 U.S. 356 (2006)   Cited 477 times   21 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "those who crafted the Bankruptcy Clause" understood it to "operat[e] free and clear of the State's claim of sovereign immunity"
  8. Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc.

    510 U.S. 569 (1994)   Cited 633 times   71 Legal Analyses
    Holding that “[i]t was error for the Court of Appeals to conclude that the commercial nature of [a secondary work] rendered it presumptively unfair”
  9. Scotto v. Almenas

    143 F.3d 105 (2d Cir. 1998)   Cited 1,919 times
    Holding that state parole officer's conduct was not protected by absolute or qualified immunity when he prepared false parole violation report and recommended arrest warrant issue and parole revocation proceedings be initiated against parolee based on fabricated parole violation
  10. Maine v. Taylor

    477 U.S. 131 (1986)   Cited 602 times
    Holding that the State of Maine, an intervenor in the district court and the only appealing party, had standing to appeal because, "if the judgment of the Court of Appeals [was] left undisturbed," Maine would "be bound by the conclusive adjudication" that its law was unenforceable
  11. Rule 56 - Summary Judgment

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 56   Cited 329,861 times   158 Legal Analyses
    Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit
  12. Section 101 - Definitions

    17 U.S.C. § 101   Cited 6,373 times   175 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing the United States' adherence to provisions of the Berne Convention of 1886
  13. Section 106 - Exclusive rights in copyrighted works

    17 U.S.C. § 106   Cited 3,759 times   108 Legal Analyses
    Granting the owners of copyrights in “literary, musical, dramatic, and choreographic works, pantomimes, and pictorial, graphic, or sculptural works” the exclusive right “to display the copyrighted work publicly”
  14. Section 102 - Subject matter of copyright: In general

    17 U.S.C. § 102   Cited 2,259 times   120 Legal Analyses
    Granting protection to "literary works"
  15. Section 301 - Preemption with respect to other laws

    17 U.S.C. § 301   Cited 1,412 times   20 Legal Analyses
    Stating that when "legal or equitable rights ... are equivalent to any of the exclusive rights within the general scope of copyright ... no person is entitled to any such right or equivalent right in any such work under the common law or statutes of any State"
  16. Section 107 - Limitations on exclusive rights: Fair use

    17 U.S.C. § 107   Cited 1,016 times   177 Legal Analyses
    Designating “criticism” and “comment” as fair use
  17. Section 824 - Declaration of policy; application of subchapter

    16 U.S.C. § 824   Cited 495 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Granting FERC authority over wholesale generation and transmission
  18. Section 112 - Limitations on exclusive rights: Ephemeral recordings

    17 U.S.C. § 112   Cited 63 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Permitting retention of "ephemeral recordings" for retransmission