79 Cited authorities

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.

    477 U.S. 242 (1986)   Cited 236,238 times   38 Legal Analyses
    Holding that summary judgment is not appropriate if "the dispute about a material fact is ‘genuine,’ that is, if the evidence is such that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party"
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett

    477 U.S. 317 (1986)   Cited 216,328 times   40 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a movant's summary judgment motion should be granted "against a [nonmovant] who fails to make a showing sufficient to establish the existence of an element essential to that party's case, and on which that party will bear the burden of proof at trial"
  3. Neitzke v. Williams

    490 U.S. 319 (1989)   Cited 55,792 times
    Holding that "an in forma pauperis pro se complaint may only be dismissed as frivolous ... when the petitioner cannot make any claim with a rational or arguable basis in law or in fact"
  4. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Prods., Inc.

    530 U.S. 133 (2000)   Cited 21,090 times   22 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, since the 58-year-old plaintiff was fired by his 60-year-old employer, there was an inference that "age discrimination was not the motive"
  5. West v. Atkins

    487 U.S. 42 (1988)   Cited 34,459 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a state's delegation of its duty to provide medical care to prisoners rendered a contract physician a state actor
  6. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green

    411 U.S. 792 (1973)   Cited 52,204 times   95 Legal Analyses
    Holding in employment discrimination case that statistical evidence of employer's general policy and practice may be relevant circumstantial evidence of discriminatory intent behind individual employment decision
  7. American Mfrs. Mut. Ins. Co. v. Sullivan

    526 U.S. 40 (1999)   Cited 4,830 times
    Holding that the private insurers were not state actors
  8. Gonzaga University v. Doe

    536 U.S. 273 (2002)   Cited 3,215 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding that nothing "short of an unambiguously conferred right ... support a cause of action brought under § 1983"
  9. Toyota Motor Mfg., Ky., Inc. v. Williams

    534 U.S. 184 (2002)   Cited 2,458 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Holding "substantially" and "major" "need to be interpreted strictly to create a demanding standard for qualifying as disabled," and therefore, to be disabled "an individual must have an impairment that prevents or severely restricts the individual from doing activities that are of central importance to most people’s daily lives"
  10. McLaughlin v. Richland Shoe Co.

    486 U.S. 128 (1988)   Cited 1,952 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "plain language" of the Fair Labor Standards Act's "willful" liquidated damages standard requires that "the employer either knew or showed reckless disregard for the matter of whether its conduct was prohibited by the statute," without regard to the outrageousness of the conduct at issue
  11. Section 1983 - Civil action for deprivation of rights

    42 U.S.C. § 1983   Cited 486,959 times   689 Legal Analyses
    Holding liable any state actor who "subjects, or causes [a person] to be subjected" to a constitutional violation
  12. Rule 56 - Summary Judgment

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 56   Cited 328,775 times   158 Legal Analyses
    Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit
  13. Section 1331 - Federal question

    28 U.S.C. § 1331   Cited 97,434 times   134 Legal Analyses
    Finding that in order to invoke federal question jurisdiction, a plaintiff's claims must arise "under the Constitution, laws, or treaties of the United States."
  14. Rule 26 - Duty to Disclose; General Provisions Governing Discovery

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 26   Cited 95,025 times   653 Legal Analyses
    Adopting Fed.R.Civ.P. 37
  15. Section 1391 - Venue generally

    28 U.S.C. § 1391   Cited 27,824 times   197 Legal Analyses
    Finding that venue lies where a "substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim" occurred
  16. Section 2000e-5 - Enforcement provisions

    42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5   Cited 26,884 times   124 Legal Analyses
    Holding charges must be made in writing, under oath, and contain all information as the Commission requires
  17. Section 12101 - Findings and purpose

    42 U.S.C. § 12101   Cited 23,323 times   65 Legal Analyses
    Finding a pattern of " unnecessary discrimination and prejudice" that "costs the United States billions of dollars in unnecessary expenses resulting from dependency and nonproductivity"
  18. Section 1746 - Unsworn declarations under penalty of perjury

    28 U.S.C. § 1746   Cited 10,033 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Permitting the use of declarations instead
  19. Section 206 - Minimum wage

    29 U.S.C. § 206   Cited 8,816 times   98 Legal Analyses
    Asking only whether the alleged inequality resulted from “any other factor other than sex”
  20. Section 203 - Definitions

    29 U.S.C. § 203   Cited 6,791 times   274 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing that "custom or practice" under a collective-bargaining agreement can make changing clothes noncompensable
  21. Section 825.220 - Protection for employees who request leave or otherwise assert FMLA rights

    29 C.F.R. § 825.220   Cited 1,750 times   43 Legal Analyses
    Adopting a "negative factor" standard
  22. Section 84.3 - Definitions

    45 C.F.R. § 84.3   Cited 607 times
    Defining "physical or mental impairment" to include "[a]ny physiological disorder or condition . . . affecting one or more . . . body systems," including the "endocrine" system
  23. Section 4A:2-5.1 - General provisions

    N.J. Admin. Code § 4A:2-5.1   Cited 8 times

    (a) An appointing authority shall not take or threaten to take any reprisal action against an employee in the career, senior executive or unclassified service in retaliation for an employee's lawful disclosure of information on the violation of any law or rule, governmental mismanagement or abuse of authority. (b) An appointing authority shall not take or threaten to take any action against an employee in the career service or an employee in the senior executive service with career status based on

  24. Section 4A:10-1.2 - Political activity

    N.J. Admin. Code § 4A:10-1.2   Cited 3 times

    (a) No employee in the career or senior executive service shall directly or indirectly use or seek to use his or her position to control or affect the political action of another person or engage in political activity during working hours. See 11A:2-23. (b) No employee in the career, senior executive, or unclassified services whose principal employment is in connection with a program financed in whole or in part by Federal grants or loans, shall engage in any of the following prohibited activities