21 Cited authorities

Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.
477 U.S. 242 (1986) Cited 235,866 times 38 Legal Analyses
Holding that summary judgment is not appropriate if "the dispute about a material fact is ‘genuine,’ that is, if the evidence is such that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party"
Saldana v. Kmart Corp.
260 F.3d 228 (3d Cir. 2001) Cited 1,532 times
Holding that a "mere possibility" is insufficient as a matter of law
Bixler v. Cent. Pa. Teamsters Health-Welfare
12 F.3d 1292 (3d Cir. 1993) Cited 347 times
Holding that an ERISA fiduciary's duty to provide "complete and accurate information" to its beneficiaries "entails not only a negative duty not to misinform, but also an affirmative duty to inform when the trustee knows that silence might be harmful"
Miscellaneous Orders
531 U.S. 1037 (2000) Cited 85 times
Holding that Brecht standard applies in all federal habeas cases under § 2254
Unisys Corp. v. Pickering
517 U.S. 1103 (1996) Cited 90 times
Holding plaintiffs claim nonjusticiable because it related to military promotion
Hozier v. Midwest Fasteners, Inc.
908 F.2d 1155 (3d Cir. 1990) Cited 274 times
Holding that failure to follow this procedural requirement negates the effectiveness of the attempted modification
Griggs v. E.I. Dupont De Nemours & Co.
237 F.3d 371 (4th Cir. 2001) Cited 195 times
Holding that "reinstatement, as a genera] equitable concept, is within the range of redress permitted," and remanding for inquiry into whether reinstatement of the parties to the pre-election status quo was appropriate
Bowerman v. Wal-Mart Stores Incorporated
226 F.3d 574 (7th Cir. 2000) Cited 186 times
Holding a fiduciary liable when inadequacies in the plan documents were exacerbated by incorrect and misleading information from its agents
International Union v. Skinner Engine Co.
188 F.3d 130 (3d Cir. 1999) Cited 188 times 4 Legal Analyses
Holding that courts may infer from employer continuing to provide retiree benefits after termination of a collective bargaining agreement that retiree benefits were vested by that agreement
In re Unisys Corp.
57 F.3d 1255 (3d Cir. 1995) Cited 183 times
Holding that "restitutionary reimbursement of back benefits" is form of equitable relief available under § 502
Section 2520.102-2 - Style and format of summary plan description
29 C.F.R. § 2520.102-2 Cited 165 times 11 Legal Analyses
Detailing standards of clarity in summary plan descriptions

Finnegan v. Medco Health Solutions, Inc. et al

21 Cited authorities

Holding that summary judgment is not appropriate if "the dispute about a material fact is ‘genuine,’ that is, if the evidence is such that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party"

Holding that a "mere possibility" is insufficient as a matter of law

Holding that an ERISA fiduciary's duty to provide "complete and accurate information" to its beneficiaries "entails not only a negative duty not to misinform, but also an affirmative duty to inform when the trustee knows that silence might be harmful"

Holding that Brecht standard applies in all federal habeas cases under § 2254

Holding plaintiffs claim nonjusticiable because it related to military promotion

Holding that failure to follow this procedural requirement negates the effectiveness of the attempted modification

Holding that "reinstatement, as a genera] equitable concept, is within the range of redress permitted," and remanding for inquiry into whether reinstatement of the parties to the pre-election status quo was appropriate

Holding a fiduciary liable when inadequacies in the plan documents were exacerbated by incorrect and misleading information from its agents

Holding that courts may infer from employer continuing to provide retiree benefits after termination of a collective bargaining agreement that retiree benefits were vested by that agreement

Holding that "restitutionary reimbursement of back benefits" is form of equitable relief available under § 502

Detailing standards of clarity in summary plan descriptions