Marshall v. Chater
75 F.3d 1421 (10th Cir. 1996) Cited 1,680 timesHolding “issues raised for the first time in objections to magistrate judge's recommendations are deemed waived”
Paterson-Leitch v. Massachusetts Elec
840 F.2d 985 (1st Cir. 1988) Cited 2,028 timesHolding categorically that party is not entitled as of right to district judge's de novo review of matter never raised before magistrate judge
Greenhow v. Sec. of Health Human Services
863 F.2d 633 (9th Cir. 1988) Cited 270 timesHolding that arguments raised for the first time to the district court reviewing a magistrate's report were waived explaining that the "Magistrates Act was [not] intended to give litigants an opportunity to run one version of their case past the magistrate, then another past the district court"
U.S. v. Hardesty
977 F.2d 1347 (9th Cir. 1992) Cited 228 timesHolding that a district court's refusal to hear a new argument not presented to the Magistrate Judge is "entirely appropriate" because "[w]e do not believe that the Magistrates Act was intended to give litigants an opportunity to run one version of their case past the magistrate, then another past the district court"
Rule 72 - Magistrate Judges: Pretrial Order
Fed. R. Civ. P. 72 Cited 167,094 times 20 Legal AnalysesGranting a party fourteen days to object to a Magistrate Judge's non-dispositive order
Rule 801 - Definitions That Apply to This Article; Exclusions from Hearsay
Fed. R. Evid. 801 Cited 19,129 times 75 Legal AnalysesHolding that such a statement must merely be made by the party and offered against that party
Section 227 - Restrictions on use of telephone equipment
47 U.S.C. § 227 Cited 5,675 times 734 Legal AnalysesGranting exclusive jurisdiction to federal courts over actions brought by state attorney generals