§Why CasetextPricing

Fields v. Twitter, Inc.

RESPONSE

38 Cited authorities

  1. Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project

    561 U.S. 1 (2010)   Cited 865 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the plaintiffs had standing because a statute criminalized knowingly providing material support or resources to a foreign terrorist organization, and the plaintiffs had provided support to groups designated as terrorist organizations and planned to provide similar support in the future

  2. Maracich v. Spears

    570 U.S. 48 (2013)   Cited 311 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Rejecting literal reading of Driver's Privacy Protection Act that would create exception for solicitation by lawyers

  3. Diamond v. Diehr

    450 U.S. 175 (1981)   Cited 528 times   130 Legal Analyses
    Holding a procedure for molding rubber that included a computer program is within patentable subject matter

  4. Licci ex rel. Licci v. Lebanese Canadian Bank SAL

    673 F.3d 50 (2d Cir. 2012)   Cited 673 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Finding New York law applied to tort claim where all of the challenged conduct occurred in New York even though the plaintiffs' injuries occurred in Israel, where they were domiciled

  5. Nitro-Lift Techs., L.L.C. v. Howard

    568 U.S. 17 (2012)   Cited 183 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Holding validity of covenants not to compete was for arbitrator to decide

  6. Rothstein v. UBS AG

    708 F.3d 82 (2d Cir. 2013)   Cited 461 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that ATA's "statutory silence on the subject of secondary liability means there is none"

  7. Lerner v. Fleet Bank, N.A.

    318 F.3d 113 (2d Cir. 2003)   Cited 484 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that lack of statutory standing under RICO "is not jurisdictional in nature . . . but is rather an element of the merits addressed under a Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b) motion for failure to state a claim"

  8. Hydro Investors v. Trafalgar Power Inc.

    227 F.3d 8 (2d Cir. 2000)   Cited 494 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that contribution may lie for breach of contract actions in the "limited class of cases involving liability for the violation of a professional duty"

  9. Holy Land Foundation v. Ashcroft

    333 F.3d 156 (D.C. Cir. 2003)   Cited 364 times
    Holding that when the failure results in no prejudice to the nonmoving party, "we find error to be harmless."

  10. Batzel v. Smith

    333 F.3d 1018 (9th Cir. 2003)   Cited 361 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the denial of an anti-SLAPP motion is appealable under § 1291

  11. Section 230 - Protection for private blocking and screening of offensive material

    47 U.S.C. § 230   Cited 1,027 times   168 Legal Analyses
    Limiting liability

  12. Section 2339B - Providing material support or resources to designated foreign terrorist organizations

    18 U.S.C. § 2339B   Cited 579 times   15 Legal Analyses
    Clarifying the scope of “personnel”

  13. Section 2339A - Providing material support to terrorists

    18 U.S.C. § 2339A   Cited 490 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Defining “ ‘material support or resources' ” as “any property, tangible or intangible ”

  14. Section 2333 - Civil remedies

    18 U.S.C. § 2333   Cited 468 times   22 Legal Analyses
    Granting any ATA claimant the right to sue "in any appropriate district court of the United States"

  15. Section 2331 - Definitions

    18 U.S.C. § 2331   Cited 337 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Defining "domestic terrorism" to require this element