550 U.S. 544 (2007) Cited 277,112 times 369 Legal Analyses
Holding that allegations of conduct that are merely consistent with wrongdoing do not state a claim unless "placed in a context that raises a suggestion of" such wrongdoing
Holding extrinsic materials were not "integral" to the complaint because the complaint "d[id] not refer to the[m]" and "plaintiffs apparently did not rely on them in drafting it"
Discussing a Nebraska statute of repose forbidding product liability suits brought more than ten years after the product that allegedly caused injury was delivered to the end consumer
Holding plaintiffs had necessary information about whom to sue or that with required diligence they should have known who to sue by the end of the limitations period
Holding that a court may reject equitable tolling as a matter of law only where it is "evident from the face of the complaint" that the plaintiff will be unable to make the required factual showing
Holding that, under Puerto Rico law, the running of the one-year statute of limitations for tort actions "does not require actual knowledge; it is enough that the would-be plaintiff had notice that would have led a reasonable person to investigate and so uncover the needed information"
Limiting the limitations period for causes of action accruing outside of New York where the foreign jurisdiction imposes a shorter statute of limitations than the state does