27 Cited authorities

  1. Ashcroft v. Iqbal

    556 U.S. 662 (2009)   Cited 260,142 times   281 Legal Analyses
    Holding court need not credit "mere conclusory statements" in complaint
  2. Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly

    550 U.S. 544 (2007)   Cited 273,590 times   368 Legal Analyses
    Holding that allegations of conduct that are merely consistent with wrongdoing do not state a claim unless "placed in a context that raises a suggestion of" such wrongdoing
  3. Chambers v. Time Warner, Inc.

    282 F.3d 147 (2d Cir. 2002)   Cited 6,388 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding extrinsic materials were not "integral" to the complaint because the complaint "d[id] not refer to the[m]" and "plaintiffs apparently did not rely on them in drafting it"
  4. Staehr v. Hartford Financial Serv

    547 F.3d 406 (2d Cir. 2008)   Cited 882 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that matters judicially noticed by a court "are not considered matters outside the pleadings"
  5. Design Strategy v. Davis

    469 F.3d 284 (2d Cir. 2006)   Cited 619 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a bad faith requirement "should not be read into the Rule."
  6. Ellington Credit Fund, Ltd. v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.

    837 F. Supp. 2d 162 (S.D.N.Y. 2011)   Cited 274 times
    Holding that trustees did not have any "monitoring or safeguarding duties beyond those explicitly provided in the PSA"
  7. Stuart v. American Cyanamid Company

    158 F.3d 622 (2d Cir. 1998)   Cited 263 times
    Discussing a Nebraska statute of repose forbidding product liability suits brought more than ten years after the product that allegedly caused injury was delivered to the end consumer
  8. Torres v. E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Co.

    219 F.3d 13 (1st Cir. 2000)   Cited 203 times
    Holding plaintiffs had necessary information about whom to sue or that with required diligence they should have known who to sue by the end of the limitations period
  9. Cantor Fitzgerald Inc. v. Lutnick

    313 F.3d 704 (2d Cir. 2002)   Cited 134 times
    Holding that a court may reject equitable tolling as a matter of law only where it is "evident from the face of the complaint" that the plaintiff will be unable to make the required factual showing
  10. Arturet Velez v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.

    429 F.3d 10 (1st Cir. 2005)   Cited 108 times
    Holding that, under Puerto Rico law, the running of the one-year statute of limitations for tort actions "does not require actual knowledge; it is enough that the would-be plaintiff had notice that would have led a reasonable person to investigate and so uncover the needed information"
  11. Rule 12 - Defenses and Objections: When and How Presented; Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; Consolidating Motions; Waiving Defenses; Pretrial Hearing

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 12   Cited 354,229 times   943 Legal Analyses
    Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss
  12. Section 202 - Cause of action accruing without the state

    N.Y. CPLR 202   Cited 589 times
    Limiting the limitations period for causes of action accruing outside of New York where the foreign jurisdiction imposes a shorter statute of limitations than the state does