§Why CasetextPricing

Federal National Mortgage Association et al v. SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC et al

MOTION to Strike 54 Motion for Leave to File;

21 Cited authorities

  1. Khoury v. Meserve

    Civil Action No. DKC 2002-3511 (D. Md. Jun. 23, 2003)   Cited 618 times
    Holding that a plaintiff's allegations that her supervisor "yelled at [her], told her she was incompetent, pushed her down in her chair, and blocked the door to prevent [her] from leaving while he continued to hell at her" were not sufficient to establish a hostile work environment claim

  2. Ralls Corp. v. Comm. on Foreign Inv. in the United States

    758 F.3d 296 (D.C. Cir. 2014)   Cited 192 times   10 Legal Analyses
    Rejecting argument that statute had eliminated jurisdiction over a due-process claim

  3. Lewis v. Rumsfeld

    154 F. Supp. 2d 56 (D.D.C. 2001)   Cited 129 times
    Denying leave to file a sur-reply where the plaintiff failed to demonstrate that the defendant's reply presented any new matters

  4. Bollow v. Federal Res. Bank of San Francisco

    650 F.2d 1093 (9th Cir. 1981)   Cited 207 times
    Holding that Federal Reserve Bank employee's claims alleging a right to a hearing before termination under state law conflicted with and were preempted by the at-pleasure provision in 12 U.S.C. § 341(Fifth)

  5. In re Dairy Farmers of Am., Inc. Cheese Antitrust Litig.

    80 F. Supp. 3d 838 (N.D. Ill. 2015)   Cited 47 times
    Refusing to impose sanctions on factual allegations made "with a healthy dose of hyperbole" that were not "wholly without evidentiary support"

  6. Crummey v. Soc. Sec. Admin.

    794 F. Supp. 2d 46 (D.D.C. 2011)   Cited 36 times
    Granting summary judgment on similar Privacy Act claim where plaintiff "failed to present even a scintilla of competent evidence suggesting that the SSA's records are, in actuality, materially inaccurate or incomplete"

  7. Garrison v. Northeast Georgia Medical Center, Inc.

    66 F. Supp. 2d 1336 (N.D. Ga. 1999)   Cited 52 times
    Holding that the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure do not authorize sur-replies

  8. Avery v. Barsky

    Case No. 3:12-cv-00652-MMD-WGC (D. Nev. Apr. 17, 2013)   Cited 18 times

    Case No. 3:12-cv-00652-MMD-WGC 04-17-2013 THOMAS AVERY and KURT STABEL, Plaintiffs, v. STANFORD BARSKY, Defendant. MIRANDA M. DU ORDER (Defendant's Motion to Dismiss - dkt. no. 26) (Plaintiffs' Request for Leave to File Sur- Reply to Defendant's Reply Brief - dkt. no. 29) I. SUMMARY Before the Court are Defendant Stanford Barsky's Motion to Dismiss (dkt. no. 26) and Plaintiffs' Request for Leave to File Surreply to Defendant's Reply Brief (dkt. no. 29). For the reasons stated below, Defendant's Motion

  9. Smith v. United States

    Case No.: 2:13-cv-039-JAD-GWF (D. Nev. Mar. 28, 2014)   Cited 15 times

    Case No.: 2:13-cv-039-JAD-GWF 03-28-2014 Bradley Smith, Plaintiff, v. United States of America, Defendant. JENNIFER A. DORSEY Order Granting Defendant's Motion to Dismiss [Doc. 8] Plaintiff Bradley Smith sues the United States Government on a number of legal theories alleging that, during his employment with the Government, his supervisor's hostile treatment induced him to attempt suicide. See Doc. 1. The United States moves to dismiss the entire action under Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 12(b)(1), arguing

  10. Shell Co., Ltd. v. Los Frailes Service Station, Inc.

    596 F. Supp. 2d 193 (D.P.R. 2008)   Cited 17 times
    Holding that the nonexclusive licensee "ha[d] a reasonable interest to be protected and ha[d] properly asserted a basis [to sue] pursuant to section 43"

  11. Rule 5 - Serving and Filing Pleadings and Other Papers

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 5   Cited 23,013 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Allowing service by filing papers with the court's electronic-filing system

  12. Section 4617 - Authority over critically undercapitalized regulated entities

    12 U.S.C. § 4617   Cited 669 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Granting the FHFA the power to “operate” Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and “to conduct all [of their] business”