§Why CasetextPricing

Federal Housing Finance Agency v. Nomura Holding America, Inc. et al

MOTION in Limine No. 8 on GSE Pre-Settlement Documents and Testimony. Document

14 Cited authorities

  1. Amgen Inc. v. Conn. Ret. Plans & Tr. Funds

    568 U.S. 455 (2013)   Cited 1,815 times   100 Legal Analyses
    Holding that certain merits questions “should not be resolved in deciding whether to certify a proposed class,” but are “properly addressed at trial or in a ruling on a summary-judgment motion”

  2. Basic Inc. v. Levinson

    485 U.S. 224 (1988)   Cited 3,343 times   307 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the District Court appropriately certified the class based on the presumption of reliance

  3. In re Morgan Stanley Infor

    592 F.3d 347 (2d Cir. 2010)   Cited 417 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Affirming the district court's dismissal of a Section 15 claim where the plaintiffs' Section 11 and 12 claims were properly dismissed

  4. New Jersey Carpenters Health Fund v. Royal Bank of Scotland Group, PLC

    709 F.3d 109 (2d Cir. 2013)   Cited 292 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding statements in RMBS prospectus supplements could be material

  5. Litwin v. Blackstone Group, L.P.

    634 F.3d 706 (2d Cir. 2011)   Cited 302 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that courts must analyze all relevant qualitative and quantitative factors in assessing materiality

  6. United Paperworkers Intern. v. Intl. Paper

    985 F.2d 1190 (2d Cir. 1993)   Cited 98 times
    Holding that a reasonable shareholder voting on a proposal who had read both the proxy statement and the annual report would have received no indication that additional information was available in the 10-K report

  7. In re Britannia Bulk Holdings Inc. Securities Litigation

    665 F. Supp. 2d 404 (S.D.N.Y. 2009)   Cited 13 times
    Holding that Section 11 claims were subject to Rule 12(b) dismissal where the alleged corrective disclosure did "not speak at all" to the alleged fraud

  8. In re Metlife Demutualization Litigation

    229 F.R.D. 369 (E.D.N.Y. 2005)   Cited 15 times
    Certifying plaintiff class

  9. Rule 403 - Excluding Relevant Evidence for Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time, or Other Reasons

    Fed. R. Evid. 403   Cited 22,463 times   81 Legal Analyses
    Adopting a similar standard, but requiring the probative value to be "substantially outweighed" by these risks

  10. Rule 402 - General Admissibility of Relevant Evidence

    Fed. R. Evid. 402   Cited 6,633 times   10 Legal Analyses
    Providing relevant evidence is admissible unless prohibited by the United States Constitution, a federal statute, the Federal Rules of Evidence, or other rules prescribed by the Supreme Court

  11. Rule 701 - Opinion Testimony by Lay Witnesses

    Fed. R. Evid. 701   Cited 5,710 times   26 Legal Analyses
    Requiring lay opinion testimony to be "rationally based on the witness's perception"

  12. Section 77l - Civil liabilities arising in connection with prospectuses and communications

    15 U.S.C. § 77l   Cited 820 times   22 Legal Analyses
    Authorizing relief if the offering documents contain just one untrue statement of material fact

  13. Section 13.1-522 - Civil liabilities

    Va. Code § 13.1-522   Cited 62 times
    Stating a securities violation when a person sells a security "by means of" a misrepresentation

  14. Section 31-5606.05 - Civil liability

    D.C. Code § 31-5606.05   Cited 18 times
    Imposing liability for an “untrue statement of a material fact”