481 U.S. 252 (1987) Cited 252 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that the “right to discharge an employee for cause constitutes a property interest protected by the Fifth Amendment,” the deprivation of which must be accompanied by an “opportunity to be heard ‘at a meaningful time and in a meaningful manner’ ” (quoting Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319, 333, 96 S.Ct. 893, 47 L.Ed.2d 18 (1976))
Holding that "the value added to fee lands by a revocable permit authorizing the use of neighboring lands that the Government owns" is not compensable under the Fifth Amendment
Holding that when a debtor is solvent, the creditors are entitled to receive post-petition interest at the legal rate under a chapter 11 plan of reorganization
Holding that Federal Reserve Bank employee's claims alleging a right to a hearing before termination under state law conflicted with and were preempted by the at-pleasure provision in 12 U.S.C. § 341(Fifth)