111 Cited authorities

  1. Tellabs v. Makor Issues Rights

    551 U.S. 308 (2007)   Cited 9,118 times   104 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a strong inference is one that is "cogent and at least as compelling as any opposing inference"
  2. Stewart Org., Inc. v. Ricoh Corp.

    487 U.S. 22 (1988)   Cited 4,868 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Holding that federal law determines the validity of a forum selection clause
  3. Piper Aircraft Co. v. Reyno

    454 U.S. 235 (1981)   Cited 4,738 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that potential change in law cannot, by itself, fend off dismissal under forum non conveniens absent showing that new law is "clearly inadequate or unsatisfactory"
  4. Stoneridge Investment Partners, LLC v. Scientific-Atlanta, Inc.

    552 U.S. 148 (2008)   Cited 1,181 times   80 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the fraud-on-the-market presumption did not apply because business partners' "deceptive acts were not communicated to the public"
  5. ATSI Communications, Inc. v. Shaar Fund, Ltd.

    493 F.3d 87 (2d Cir. 2007)   Cited 3,874 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that deception occurs when "investors are misled to believe that prices at which they purchase and sell securities are determined by the natural interplay of supply and demand, not rigged by manipulators"
  6. Sprewell v. Golden State Warriors

    266 F.3d 979 (9th Cir. 2001)   Cited 5,060 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that unwarranted inferences are insufficient to defeat a motion to dismiss
  7. Akhtar v. Mesa

    698 F.3d 1202 (9th Cir. 2012)   Cited 2,321 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that allegations that in moving plaintiff to different bunk defendants ignored order requiring him to be housed in lower bunk on ground floor were sufficient "to show that [defendants] were deliberately indifferent"
  8. Swartz v. KPMG LLP

    476 F.3d 756 (9th Cir. 2007)   Cited 2,864 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that “[t]o the extent Swartz seeks a declaration of defendants' liability for damages sought for his other causes of action,” claim must be dismissed as “merely duplicative”
  9. Securities v. Zandford

    535 U.S. 813 (2002)   Cited 520 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the SEC may bring a public enforcement action against a broker who accepted payment for securities that he never delivered
  10. Samantar v. Yousuf et al.

    560 U.S. 305 (2010)   Cited 378 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the common law, rather than the FSIA, governs the immunity of foreign officials
  11. Rule 12 - Defenses and Objections: When and How Presented; Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; Consolidating Motions; Waiving Defenses; Pretrial Hearing

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 12   Cited 345,715 times   922 Legal Analyses
    Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss
  12. Section 1404 - Change of venue

    28 U.S.C. § 1404   Cited 28,357 times   184 Legal Analyses
    Granting Class Plaintiffs' motion to transfer action in order to "facilitate a unified settlement approval process together with the class action cases in" In re Amex ASR
  13. Section 1391 - Venue generally

    28 U.S.C. § 1391   Cited 27,800 times   197 Legal Analyses
    Finding that venue lies where a "substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim" occurred
  14. Rule 45 - Subpoena

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 45   Cited 16,526 times   105 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a subpoena may command a person to attend a trial, hearing, or deposition "within 100 miles of where the person resides, is employed, or regularly transacts business in person"
  15. Section 1406 - Cure or waiver of defects

    28 U.S.C. § 1406   Cited 14,132 times   52 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing that transfer is proper to any district or division in which the action could have been brought
  16. Section 78j - Manipulative and deceptive devices

    15 U.S.C. § 78j   Cited 12,502 times   165 Legal Analyses
    Granting SEC power to establish rules to further statute forbidding manipulative or deceptive devices in connection with purchase or sale of securities
  17. Section 1 - Short title

    7 U.S.C. § 1   Cited 942 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Defining an FCM as, among other things and in pertinent part, an entity that is "engaged in soliciting or in accepting orders for the purchase or sale of a commodity for future delivery" or is registered as an FCM
  18. Section 2462 - Time for commencing proceedings

    28 U.S.C. § 2462   Cited 710 times   261 Legal Analyses
    Allowing exception to five-year limitations period where Congress has provided otherwise
  19. Section 2 - Jurisdiction of Commission; liability of principal for act of agent; Commodity Futures Trading Commission; transaction in interstate commerce

    7 U.S.C. § 2   Cited 511 times   54 Legal Analyses
    Adopting respondeat superior principles for regulatory actions brought by the Commodity Exchange Commission
  20. Section 824 - Declaration of policy; application of subchapter

    16 U.S.C. § 824   Cited 495 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Granting FERC authority over wholesale generation and transmission
  21. Section 1c.2 - Prohibition of electric energy market manipulation

    18 C.F.R. § 1c.2   Cited 23 times   15 Legal Analyses

    (a) It shall be unlawful for any entity, directly or indirectly, in connection with the purchase or sale of electric energy or the purchase or sale of transmission services subject to the jurisdiction of the Commission, (1) To use or employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud, (2) To make any untrue statement of a material fact or to omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading, or