§Why CasetextPricing

In the Matter of Ranco Sand and Stone Corp., Appellant,v.Patrick Vecchio, et al., Respondents.

Brief

8 Cited authorities

  1. Watts v. Swiss Bank Corp.

    27 N.Y.2d 270 (N.Y. 1970)   Cited 248 times
    Holding that privity "includes those who are successors to a property interest . . . those whose interests are represented by a party to the action"

  2. In the Matter of Gordon v. Rush

    100 N.Y.2d 236 (N.Y. 2003)   Cited 77 times
    In Matter of Gordon v. Rush, 100 N.Y.2d 236, 762 N.Y.S.2d 18, 792 N.E.2d 168, the Court of Appeals recognized that there may be circumstances in which the issuance of a positive declaration requiring property owners to prepare and submit a draft environmental impact statement (hereinafter DEIS) itself inflicts actual injury and constitutes a final administrative action ripe for judicial review.

  3. Koch v. Consolidated Edison Co.

    62 N.Y.2d 548 (N.Y. 1984)   Cited 115 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a party could not defeat issue preclusion by arguments "grounded only in speculation" that the verdict was the result of impermissible compromise

  4. Matter of Neville v. Koch

    79 N.Y.2d 416 (N.Y. 1992)   Cited 79 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Neville, which involved the rezoning of a full City block, the City considered the environmental impact that could result from a full build-out of the allowable floor area.

  5. Ctr. of Deposit, Inc. v. Village of Deposit

    90 A.D.3d 1450 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)   Cited 10 times

    2011-12-29 In the Matter of CENTER OF DEPOSIT, INC., Appellant, v. VILLAGE OF DEPOSIT et al., Respondents, et al., Respondents. Jonathan M. Landsman, New York City, for appellant. Coughlin & Gerhart, L.L.P., Binghamton (Keith A. O'Hara of counsel), for Village of Deposit and another, respondents. STEIN Jonathan M. Landsman, New York City, for appellant. Coughlin & Gerhart, L.L.P., Binghamton (Keith A. O'Hara of counsel), for Village of Deposit and another, respondents. Before: MERCURE, Acting P.J

  6. Forte v. Kaneka Am. Corp.

    110 A.D.2d 81 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)   Cited 32 times
    Applying res judicata to a written stipulation of discontinuance "with prejudice on the merits"

  7. East End Property Co. v. Town Board

    56 A.D.3d 773 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)   Cited 6 times

    No. 2007-05041. November 25, 2008. In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review two determinations of the Town Board of Town of Brookhaven, both dated July 25, 2006, which adopted a findings statement pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act (ECL art 8) and granted the application of Caithness Long Island, LLC, for a special permit, waiver, and area variances regarding the construction of a 350-megawatt dual-fuel, combined cycle combustion turbine electric power generator,

  8. GTE Marketing, Inc. v. Colonial Aluminum Sales, Inc.

    108 A.D.2d 86 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)   Cited 6 times

    April 22, 1985 Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, Paul T. D'Amaro, J. Jessel Rothman, P.C. ( Margaret D. Kranz on the brief), for appellant. Howard L. Blau for respondent. TITONE, J.P. In this action to recover damages for breach of contract, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, which denied its motion for summary judgment. At issue is the reach of the issue preclusion branch of the doctrine of former adjudication. We conclude that an alternative finding