17 Cited authorities

  1. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.

    89 N.Y.2d 214 (N.Y. 1996)   Cited 410 times
    Holding that CPLR § 214 applies to a cause of action to recover payments of first-party benefits by the Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corporation, a statutorily created body, against the insurer of a vehicle who denied no-fault coverage
  2. Lackow v. Department of Education

    51 A.D.3d 563 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)   Cited 263 times
    Deciding Article 75 petition to vacate a § 3020-a hearing decision
  3. City Sch. Dist. of the New York v. McGraham

    2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 8228 (N.Y. 2011)   Cited 107 times

    2011-11-17 CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT OF the CITY OF NEW YORK, Appellant, v. Colleen McGRAHAM, Respondent. Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York City (Stephen J. McGrath, Cheryl Payer and Leonard Koerner of counsel), for appellant. Maria Elena Gonzalez, New York City, and Richard E. Casagrande for respondent. Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York City (Stephen J. McGrath, Cheryl Payer and Leonard Koerner of counsel), for appellant. Maria Elena Gonzalez, New York City, and Richard

  4. Asch v. N.Y.C. Bd./Dep't of Educ.

    104 A.D.3d 415 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)   Cited 53 times
    Hearing officer took into account seriousness of charges against petitioner and lack of prior disciplinary history during 20-year teaching career, and thus penalty not disproportionate to offense
  5. Principe v. New York City Dep't of Educ.

    94 A.D.3d 431 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)   Cited 28 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Hearing Officer failed to consider all of the circumstances and relevant evidence, and viewed the incidents in isolation and divorced from the context in which they occurred, thus likely influencing his determination that petitioner should be terminated. Lesser sanctions are available
  6. Principe v. N.Y.C. Dep't of Educ.

    2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 8568 (N.Y. 2012)   Cited 21 times

    2012-12-13 In the Matter of Peter PRINCIPE, Respondent, v. NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, Appellant. Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York City (Julian L. Kalkstein of counsel), for appellant. Lichten & Bright, PC, New York City (Stuart Lichten of counsel), for respondent. Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York City (Julian L. Kalkstein of counsel), for appellant. Lichten & Bright, PC, New York City (Stuart Lichten of counsel), for respondent. On review of submissions

  7. Santer v. Bd. of Educ. of E. Meadow Union Free Sch. Dist.

    2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 3189 (N.Y. 2014)   Cited 18 times   1 Legal Analyses

    No. 52 No. 51 05-06-2014 In the Matter of Richard Santer, Respondent, v. Board of Education of East Meadow Union Free School District, Appellant. ? In the Matter of Barbara Lucia, Respondent, v. Board of Education of East Meadow Union Free School District, Appellant. Case No. 51: George B. Pauta, for appellant. Sherry B. Bokser, for respondent. Case No. 52: George B. Pauta, for appellant. Sherry B. Bokser, for respondent. New York State School Boards Association, amicus curiae. ABDUS-SALAAM Case

  8. Brito v. Walcott

    115 A.D.3d 544 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)   Cited 17 times

    2014-03-20 In re Alini BRITO, Petitioner–Respondent, v. Dennis M. WALCOTT, etc., Respondent–Appellant. Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York (Suzanne K. Colt of counsel), for appellant. Altman Schochet LLP, New York (Michael A. Valentine of counsel), for respondent. MAZZARELLI Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York (Suzanne K. Colt of counsel), for appellant. Altman Schochet LLP, New York (Michael A. Valentine of counsel), for respondent. MAZZARELLI, J.P., ANDRIAS, DeGRASSE

  9. Ajeleye v. N.Y.C. Dep't of Educ.

    112 A.D.3d 425 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)   Cited 16 times

    2013-12-3 In re Joseph AJELEYE, Petitioner–Appellant, v. The NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, et al., Respondents–Respondents. Kousoulas & Associates, P.C., New York (Antonia Kousoulas of counsel), for appellant. Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York (Marta Ross of counsel), for respondents. ANDRIAS Kousoulas & Associates, P.C., New York (Antonia Kousoulas of counsel), for appellant. Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York (Marta Ross of counsel), for respondents. ANDRIAS

  10. Polayes v. City of N.Y.

    118 A.D.3d 425 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)   Cited 8 times

    2014-06-3 In re Jonathan POLAYES, Petitioner–Appellant, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, at al., Respondents–Respondents. Glass Krakower LLC, New York (John Hogrogian of counsel), for appellant. Zachary W. Carter, Corporation Counsel, New York (Janet L. Zaleon of counsel), for respondents. TOM Glass Krakower LLC, New York (John Hogrogian of counsel), for appellant. Zachary W. Carter, Corporation Counsel, New York (Janet L. Zaleon of counsel), for respondents. TOM, J.P., RENWICK, ANDRIAS, FREEDMAN, CLARK, JJ