§Why CasetextPricing

In the Matter of Terrell Williams, Respondent,v.City of New York, et al., Appellants.

Brief

5 Cited authorities

  1. Pell v. Board of Education

    34 N.Y.2d 222 (N.Y. 1974)   Cited 5,553 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Discussing the standard of review in an Article 78 appeal

  2. Lackow v. Department of Education

    51 A.D.3d 563 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)   Cited 263 times
    Deciding Article 75 petition to vacate a § 3020-a hearing decision

  3. Ambach v. Norwick

    441 U.S. 68 (1979)   Cited 153 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding constitutional a New York law requiring public schoolteachers to be citizens

  4. Melzer v. Bd. of Educ, City of New York

    336 F.3d 185 (2d Cir. 2003)   Cited 91 times
    Holding that defendant school board's termination of plaintiff teacher who belonged to association that advocated sexual relations between men and boys, was constitutional because board's interest in orderly operation of high school outweighed teacher's interest in commenting on areas of public concern

  5. Williams v. City of N.Y.

    142 A.D.3d 901 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)   Cited 2 times

    09-27-2016 In re Terrell WILLIAMS, Petitioner–Appellant, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, et al., Respondents–Respondents. Glass Krakower LLP, New York (Bryan Glass of counsel), for appellant. Zachary W. Carter, Corporation Counsel, New York (kathy Chang Park of counsel), for respondents. Glass Krakower LLP, New York (Bryan Glass of counsel), for appellant. Zachary W. Carter, Corporation Counsel, New York (kathy Chang Park of counsel), for respondents. TOM, J.P., ACOSTA, RICHTER, MANZANET–DANIELS, GESMER, JJ