21 Cited authorities

  1. State v. Danielson

    2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 9814 (N.Y. 2007)   Cited 9,457 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding a "legally sufficient verdict can be against the weight of the evidence"
  2. People v. Contes

    60 N.Y.2d 620 (N.Y. 1983)   Cited 11,959 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Stating the standard for review of the legal sufficiency of evidence in a criminal case is whether "after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt"
  3. People v. Acosta

    80 N.Y.2d 665 (N.Y. 1993)   Cited 197 times
    Explaining that New York’s attempt statute is "more stringent" than the " ‘substantial step’ test ... adopted by [the Second Circuit]"
  4. People v. Arroyo

    54 N.Y.2d 567 (N.Y. 1982)   Cited 135 times   1 Legal Analyses

    Argued November 20, 1981 Decided January 19, 1982 Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, JOSEPH COHEN, J. Sheri Lynn Johnson and William E. Hellerstein for appellant. Mario Merola, District Attorney (Robin R. Dolsky, Alan D. Marrus and Timothy J. McGinn of counsel), for respondent. FUCHSBERG, J. In the main, we are asked to say whether the admission at trial of an unavailable witness' preliminary hearing testimony constituted an unconstitutional

  5. People v. Carthrens

    171 A.D.2d 387 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)   Cited 73 times   1 Legal Analyses

    November 21, 1991 Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County, Budd G. Goodman, J. Colin Aldrin Fieman of counsel (Beth J. Thomas with him on the brief; Robert M. Morgenthau, District Attorney, attorney), for appellant. Barry A. Weinstein of counsel (Elliot H. Fuld with him on the brief; Goldstein, Weinstein Fuld, attorneys), for respondent. ELLERIN, J. At issue on this appeal is the permissible scope of review of a jury verdict by a trial court upon a motion to set aside the verdict under CPL

  6. People v. Harden

    6 A.D.3d 181 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)   Cited 18 times

    3294. Decided April 1, 2004. Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Renee White, J. on speedy trial motion; Harold Beeler, J. at jury trial and sentence), rendered April 25, 2001, convicting defendant of robbery in the first degree (two counts) and robbery in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a persistent violent felony offender, to an aggregate term of 20 years to life, unanimously affirmed. Mary C. Farrington, for Respondent. Michael E. Lipson, for Defendant-Appellant. Before: Mazzarelli

  7. People v. Thompson

    90 N.Y.2d 615 (N.Y. 1997)   Cited 22 times

    Argued September 18, 1997 Decided October 23, 1997 APPEAL, by permission of an Associate Judge of the Court of Appeals, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, entered August 5, 1996, which affirmed a judgment of the Supreme Court (John J. Clabby, J., and Steven W. Fisher, J., at trial; Steven W. Fisher, J., at sentence; see, 158 Misc.2d 397), rendered in Queens County upon a verdict convicting defendant of kidnapping in the first degree, rape

  8. People v. Brun

    58 A.D.3d 862 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)   Cited 9 times

    Nos. 2007-05151 (Ind. No. 1780/06). January 27, 2009. Appeal by the People from an order of the County Court, Nassau County (Kase, J.), dated May 11, 2007, which granted the defendant's application pursuant to CPL 290.10 (1) to set aside a jury verdict convicting him of robbery in the first degree (three counts) under counts one, two, and three of the indictment, robbery in the second degree (three counts) under counts seven, eight, and nine, criminal use of a firearm in the first degree (two counts)

  9. People v. Cameron

    194 A.D.2d 438 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)   Cited 21 times

    June 17, 1993 Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County, Shirley Levittan, J., Peter McQuillan, J., Charles Tejada, J. The Judge before whom the original hearing was held took ill, and could not decide the motion. A new Judge was assigned to the matter and, without notice to defendant, rendered a decision on the motion. This was in contravention of Judiciary Law § 21, which dictates that a Judge (other than on an Appellate Division or the Court of Appeals) "shall not decide or take part in the

  10. State v. General Electric Company

    215 A.D.2d 928 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)   Cited 16 times
    In State of New York v General Elec. Co. (215 AD2d 928 [3d Dept 1995]), the Third Department remitted for a new hearing on a discovery motion decided by a successor judge on papers submitted after oral argument to his predecessor, who retired before deciding the motion.