454 U.S. 464 (1982) Cited 4,969 times 4 Legal Analyses
Holding that "the psychological consequence presumably produced by observation of conduct with which one disagrees ... is not an injury sufficient to confer standing under Art. III, even though the disagreement is phrased in constitutional terms"
460 U.S. 37 (1983) Cited 2,244 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding that content-neutral time, place, and manner restrictions on speech must be "narrowly tailored to serve a significant government interest, and leave open ample alternative channels of communication"
529 U.S. 803 (2000) Cited 829 times 7 Legal Analyses
Holding that a statute was content based because it “applies only to channels primarily dedicated to sexually explicit adult programming or other programming that is indecent”
447 U.S. 455 (1980) Cited 733 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding that ordinance violated equal protection where it banned all residential picketing except picketing of a place of employment involved in a labor dispute
28 U.S.C. § 1331 Cited 97,373 times 134 Legal Analyses
Finding that in order to invoke federal question jurisdiction, a plaintiff's claims must arise "under the Constitution, laws, or treaties of the United States."
28 U.S.C. § 1291 Cited 88,732 times 138 Legal Analyses
Granting jurisdiction to the courts of appeals from final decisions of federal district courts "except where a direct review may be had in the Supreme Court"