§Why CasetextPricing

Fahmy v. Jay-Z et al

OPPOSITION to MOTION for Review of Magistrate's Order Compelling Production of Documents re Order on Motion to Compel,

15 Cited authorities

  1. Grimes v. City and County of San Francisco

    951 F.2d 236 (9th Cir. 1991)   Cited 879 times
    Holding that violation accrues when discriminatory act occurred

  2. Bigelow v. RKO Radio Pictures, Inc.

    327 U.S. 251 (1946)   Cited 980 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that when the plaintiff cannot prove his damages by precise computation, the jury "may make a just and reasonable estimate of the damage based on relevant data, and render its verdict accordingly"

  3. Polar Bear Prod. v. Timex Corp.

    384 F.3d 700 (9th Cir. 2004)   Cited 254 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the requirement is akin to tort principles of causation and damages"

  4. Balsley v. LFP, Inc.

    691 F.3d 747 (6th Cir. 2012)   Cited 133 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Finding that amateur photograph of a wet t-shirt contest had "a mixed nature of fact and creativity"

  5. Merritt v. International Bro. of Boilermakers

    649 F.2d 1013 (5th Cir. 1981)   Cited 275 times
    Finding the magistrate's award of expenses pursuant to Rule 37 even after judgment was rendered neither clearly erroneous nor contrary to law

  6. Frank Music Corp. v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc.

    772 F.2d 505 (9th Cir. 1985)   Cited 187 times
    Holding that infringing use of music in one of ten acts of Las Vegas casino musical revue entitled copyright holder to portion of casino's hotel and gaming operations based on revue's promotional nature

  7. Mackie v. Rieser

    296 F.3d 909 (9th Cir. 2002)   Cited 114 times
    Holding that " ‘hurt feelings' over the nature of the infringement" have no place in the actual damages calculus

  8. Jarvis v. K2 Inc.

    486 F.3d 526 (9th Cir. 2007)   Cited 52 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "in situations where the infringer could have bargained with the copyright owner to purchase the right to use the work, actual damages are what a willing buyer would have been reasonably required to pay to a willing seller for plaintiffs' work'" (quoting Frank Music Corp. v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc., 772 F.2d 505, 512 (9th Cir. 1985))

  9. Gabriel Technologies Corporation v. Qualcomm Inc.

    857 F. Supp. 2d 997 (S.D. Cal. 2012)   Cited 21 times
    Finding that Section 2019.210 should be applied because it does not conflict with any federal rule and avoids undesirable forum shopping

  10. Jarvis v. a M Records

    827 F. Supp. 282 (D.N.J. 1993)   Cited 41 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that state law claims were preempted by § 301

  11. Rule 72 - Magistrate Judges: Pretrial Order

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 72   Cited 168,061 times   20 Legal Analyses
    Granting a party fourteen days to object to a Magistrate Judge's non-dispositive order