17 Cited authorities

  1. Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.

    418 U.S. 323 (1974)   Cited 3,480 times   15 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, although a private figure can recover damages for defamation if he proves the speaker acted negligently, he must prove actual malice to recover presumed or punitive damages if the statement was on a matter of public concern
  2. Herbert v. Lando

    441 U.S. 153 (1979)   Cited 1,385 times
    Holding that the relevancy of deposing a defendant publisher in a defamation case about his conduct and mental state could "hardly be doubted" even if the defendant was unlikely to admit to liable conduct in the deposition
  3. Pod-Ners, LLC v. Northern Feed & Bean of Lucerne Ltd. Liability Co.

    204 F.R.D. 675 (D. Colo. 2002)   Cited 461 times
    Granting a motion to expedite discovery to allow for the inspection, sampling and testing of defendant's field beans
  4. Hall v. Walter

    969 P.2d 224 (Colo. 1998)   Cited 161 times
    Holding that, when certain requirements are met, non-consumers have standing to maintain privatecause of action under Colorado Consumer Protection Act
  5. Femedeer v. Haun

    227 F.3d 1244 (10th Cir. 2000)   Cited 130 times
    Finding the application of Utah's sex-offender registration and notification system, including dissemination of the information on the internet, nonpunitive
  6. National Commodity and Barter Ass'n v. Gibbs

    886 F.2d 1240 (10th Cir. 1989)   Cited 143 times
    Holding that "the federal courts lack jurisdiction over the unnamed parties, as a case has not been commenced with respect to them"
  7. London-Sire Records, Inc. v. Doe 1

    542 F. Supp. 2d 153 (D. Mass. 2008)   Cited 73 times
    Holding that the segment of a hard disc on which an electronic music file is encoded is a "phonorecord" under the Copyright Act
  8. Matrixx Initiatives v. Doe

    138 Cal.App.4th 872 (Cal. Ct. App. 2006)   Cited 18 times
    In Matrixx, a pharmaceutical company filed a lawsuit claiming that several anonymous posts to the online message board had defamed it. (Matrixx, supra, 138 Cal.App.4th at p. 875, 42 Cal.Rptr.3d 79.) The company was able to trace the posts to the offices of a San Francisco hedge fund, and it took the deposition of that fund's manager to identify the anonymous poster.
  9. Lukowski v. County of Seneca

    08-CV-6098 (W.D.N.Y. Feb. 24, 2009)   Cited 11 times
    Severing claims against defendants who had been indicted and/or convicted of crimes
  10. Terrell v. Immigration Naturalization Ser

    157 F.3d 806 (10th Cir. 1998)   Cited 18 times
    Concluding that petitioner who was being deported under IIRIRA § 309(c)(g) was not a citizen and therefore the court lacked jurisdiction to review BIA deportation order
  11. Rule 56 - Summary Judgment

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 56   Cited 270,521 times   115 Legal Analyses
    Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit
  12. Rule 26 - Duty to Disclose; General Provisions Governing Discovery

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 26   Cited 64,095 times   481 Legal Analyses
    Adopting Fed.R.Civ.P. 37
  13. Rule 11 - Signing Pleadings, Motions, and Other Papers; Representations to the Court; Sanctions

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 11   Cited 25,274 times   99 Legal Analyses
    Holding an "unrepresented party" to the same standard as an attorney
  14. Rule 1 - Scope and Purpose

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 1   Cited 10,419 times   33 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing that the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure "should be construed, administered and employed by the court and the parties to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action and proceeding"
  15. Section 6-1-101 - Short title

    Colo. Rev. Stat. § 6-1-101   Cited 184 times

    This article shall be known and may be cited as the "Colorado Consumer Protection Act". C.R.S. § 6-1-101 L. 69: p. 376, § 13. C.R.S. 1963: § 55-5-13.