§Why CasetextPricing

Faconnable USA Corporation v. John Does 1-10

RESPONSE to 9 MOTION for Protective Order and to Modify April 18, 7 Order Permitting Expedited Discovery

17 Cited authorities

  1. Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.

    418 U.S. 323 (1974)   Cited 3,874 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a private defamation plaintiff cannot recover punitive damages without proving actual malice

  2. Herbert v. Lando

    441 U.S. 153 (1979)   Cited 1,586 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the relevancy of deposing a defendant publisher in a defamation case about his conduct and mental state could "hardly be doubted" even if the defendant was unlikely to admit to liable conduct in the deposition

  3. Pod-Ners, LLC v. Northern Feed & Bean of Lucerne Ltd. Liability Co.

    204 F.R.D. 675 (D. Colo. 2002)   Cited 472 times
    Granting a motion to expedite discovery to allow for the inspection, sampling and testing of defendant's field beans

  4. Femedeer v. Haun

    227 F.3d 1244 (10th Cir. 2000)   Cited 201 times
    Finding the application of Utah's sex-offender registration and notification system, including dissemination of the information on the internet, nonpunitive

  5. Hall v. Walter

    969 P.2d 224 (Colo. 1998)   Cited 186 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, when certain requirements are met, non-consumers have standing to maintain privatecause of action under Colorado Consumer Protection Act

  6. National Commodity and Barter Ass'n v. Gibbs

    886 F.2d 1240 (10th Cir. 1989)   Cited 174 times
    Holding that "the federal courts lack jurisdiction over the unnamed parties, as a case has not been commenced with respect to them"

  7. London-Sire Records, Inc. v. Doe 1

    542 F. Supp. 2d 153 (D. Mass. 2008)   Cited 83 times
    Holding that the segment of a hard disc on which an electronic music file is encoded is a "phonorecord" under the Copyright Act

  8. Matrixx Initiatives v. Doe

    138 Cal.App.4th 872 (Cal. Ct. App. 2006)   Cited 28 times
    Refusing to provide guidance interpreting a new statute after remand

  9. Lukowski v. County of Seneca

    No. 08-CV-6098 (W.D.N.Y. Feb. 24, 2009)   Cited 11 times
    Severing claims against defendants who had been indicted and/or convicted of crimes

  10. 20/20 FINANCIAL CONSULTING, INC. v. JOHN DOES 1 — 5

    Civil Action No. 10-cv-01006-CMA-KMT (D. Colo. May. 11, 2010)   Cited 8 times

    Civil Action No. 10-cv-01006-CMA-KMT. May 11, 2010 ORDER KATHLEEN TAFOYA, Magistrate Judge This matter is before the court on Plaintiff's "Motion for Expedited Order Authorizing Discovery Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(d)." (Doc. No. 2, filed May 4, 2010 [hereinafter "Mot."].) In this case, Plaintiff is alleging that the unknown "John Doe" Defendants (hereinafter "Defendants") have posted false and defamatory messages about Plaintiff on various internet weblog and bulletin board websites. Plaintiff

  11. Rule 56 - Summary Judgment

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 56   Cited 328,543 times   158 Legal Analyses
    Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit

  12. Rule 26 - Duty to Disclose; General Provisions Governing Discovery

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 26   Cited 94,817 times   651 Legal Analyses
    Adopting Fed.R.Civ.P. 37

  13. Rule 11 - Signing Pleadings, Motions, and Other Papers; Representations to the Court; Sanctions

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 11   Cited 35,740 times   139 Legal Analyses
    Holding an "unrepresented party" to the same standard as an attorney

  14. Rule 1 - Scope and Purpose

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 1   Cited 15,007 times   47 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing the federal rules of civil procedure should be employed to promote the "just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action and proceeding"

  15. Section 6-1-101 - Short title

    Colo. Rev. Stat. § 6-1-101   Cited 233 times   4 Legal Analyses

    This article shall be known and may be cited as the "Colorado Consumer Protection Act". C.R.S. § 6-1-101 L. 69: p. 376, § 13. C.R.S. 1963: § 55-5-13.