§Why CasetextPricing

Patrick Lynch,, et al., Respondents,v.The City of New York, et al., Appellants.

Brief

23 Cited authorities

  1. Mertens v. Hewitt Assocs

    508 U.S. 248 (1993)   Cited 1,840 times   24 Legal Analyses
    Holding that relief under section 502 is limited to remedies traditionally available in equity, such as injunctions, mandamus, and restitution

  2. Barnhart v. Sigmon Coal Co.

    534 U.S. 438 (2002)   Cited 838 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that where Congress has listed some categories of people as to successor liability under 26 U.S.C. § 9706, those not included in the list are not liable because Congress could have included them "clearly and explicitly"

  3. Wisconsin Dept. of Revenue v. Wrigley Co.

    505 U.S. 214 (1992)   Cited 134 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the extent of the injuries received, which the circuit court found to be minor, was no basis for dismissing the § 1983 claim because "the blows directed at Hudson, which caused bruises, swelling, loosened teeth, and a cracked dental plate, are not de minimis for Eighth Amendment purposes"

  4. Chemical Specialties Manufacturers Ass'n v. Jorling

    85 N.Y.2d 382 (N.Y. 1995)   Cited 188 times
    Using executive memorandum and Governor's Message of Approval to interpret New York environmental protection statutes

  5. Amorosi v. South Colonie Independent Central School District

    2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 9904 (N.Y. 2007)   Cited 114 times
    Holding that "the one-year limitation prescribed in Education Law § 3813(2-b) should govern discrimination claims against a school district"

  6. Chateau D' If Corp. v. City of New York

    219 A.D.2d 205 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)   Cited 127 times
    Holding that because "a liquidated damages clause and a provision entitling a nondefaulting vendor to further damages are incompatible and cannot coexist," the liquidated damages provision is rendered unenforceable

  7. Doctors Council v. Nycers

    71 N.Y.2d 669 (N.Y. 1988)   Cited 149 times
    Noting the statutory protection afforded by Adm. Code §§ 13-104 and 13-101 to all persons in City-service, designed to exclude persons such as independent contractors, remains as important and relevant as when the statute was passed

  8. B F Bldg. Corp. v. Liebig

    76 N.Y.2d 689 (N.Y. 1990)   Cited 123 times
    In B F Bldg. Corp. v. Liebig (76 N.Y.2d 689) and in Mortise v. 55 Liberty Owners Corp. (63 N.Y.2d 743, affd forreasons stated at 102 A.D.2d 719), the Court of Appeals held that home improvement contractors who had not secured the license required by a local New York City law were not entitled to recover damages for breach of contract.

  9. In the Matter of Theroux v. Reilly

    1 N.Y.3d 232 (N.Y. 2003)   Cited 80 times
    In Theroux, the New York Court of Appeals considered whether a police officer had to satisfy a "heightened risk" standard to qualify for benefits under a state statute that provided full wages to municipal employees injured "in the performance of" their duties.

  10. Pultz v. Economakis

    2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 4900 (N.Y. 2008)   Cited 59 times
    In Pultz v Economakis, 10 NY3d 542, cited by the attorney for plaintiffs, a couple sought to evict the tenants in 15 rent-stabilized apartments from an East Village tenement in order to convert the 60-room tenement into their own single-family home containing a gym, a playroom, a library, five bedrooms and six bathrooms.