§Why CasetextPricing

In the Matter of John Gaied, Appellant,v.New York State Tax Appeals Tribunal, et al., Respondents.

Brief

27 Cited authorities

  1. Riley v. County of Broome

    95 N.Y.2d 455 (N.Y. 2000)   Cited 389 times
    Holding that the legislative history of Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1103 evinces an intent to impose “a minimum standard of care” on operators of vehicles engaged in roadwork

  2. DaimlerChrysler v. Spitzer

    7 N.Y.3d 653 (N.Y. 2006)   Cited 225 times
    In Spitzer, James Warner bought a new truck manufactured by General Motors Corporation in March 2003. Shortly after acquiring the truck, Warner discovered a transmission problem and attempted to have the problem fixed on five occasions between April and November 2003.

  3. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's v. Ind. Gas

    525 U.S. 931 (1998)   Cited 56 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Affirming a finding that excusable neglect had not been shown when a default was granted due to an attorney's inaction, but the defaulting party made no attempt to contact his attorney over an 11-month period

  4. Ferres v. New Rochelle

    68 N.Y.2d 446 (N.Y. 1986)   Cited 172 times
    Holding municipality opened suburban park without the encouragement of the New York Recreational Use Act

  5. Doctors Council v. Nycers

    71 N.Y.2d 669 (N.Y. 1988)   Cited 149 times
    Noting the statutory protection afforded by Adm. Code §§ 13-104 and 13-101 to all persons in City-service, designed to exclude persons such as independent contractors, remains as important and relevant as when the statute was passed

  6. Jennings v. Mental Health off

    90 N.Y.2d 227 (N.Y. 1997)   Cited 114 times

    Argued April 30, 1997; Decided June 12, 1997 Appeal from Appellate Division of the Supreme Court, Third Judicial Department, Albany County Dennis C. Vacco, Attorney-General, Albany ( Patrick Barnett-Mulligan, Barbara G. Billet and Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for New York State Office of Mental Health and another, appellants. Stein Schonfeld, Garden City ( Robert L. Schonfeld, Seth P. Stein and Beth Pepper of counsel), for Rehabilitation Support Services, Inc., appellant. Vincent J. McArdle, Jr.

  7. 1605 Book v. Appeals Tribunal

    83 N.Y.2d 240 (N.Y. 1994)   Cited 35 times

    Argued January 11, 1994 Decided February 15, 1994 Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department. Lipsitz, Green, Fahringer, Roll, Salisbury Cambria, New York City (Herald Price Fahringer and Diarmuid White of counsel), for appellant. G. Oliver Koppell, Attorney-General, Albany (John McConnell, Jerry Boone and Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for Commissioner of Taxation and Finance of the State of New York, respondent. BELLACOSA, J. Article 28 of the Tax Law

  8. In re New York City

    2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 1387 (N.Y. 2007)   Cited 18 times
    Holding that New York statute that gave public employees the right to “form, join, and participate in ... any employee organization of their own choosing” did not confer the Weingarten right; “Since the ‘mutual aid or protection’ language is absent from [the New York statute], Weingarten does not support a holding that [the statute] creates a Weingarten right”

  9. SIN, Inc. v. Department of Finance

    71 N.Y.2d 616 (N.Y. 1988)   Cited 41 times

    Argued March 22, 1988 Decided May 3, 1988 Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department. Peter L. Zimroth, Corporation Counsel (James F. Eller, Glenn Newman and Stanley Buchsbaum of counsel), for appellant. Stephen R. Sugrue and Stephen S. Ziegler for respondent. Per Curiam. Petitioner, a corporation engaged in the operation of a Spanish language television network, leased commercial office space in Manhattan in September 1981. The 15 1/2-year lease was

  10. Sedacca v. Mangano

    2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 1319 (N.Y. 2012)   Cited 9 times

    2012-02-21 In the Matter of Dolores SEDACCA et al., Appellants, et al., Petitioners, v. Edward P. MANGANO, County Executive of Nassau County, et al., Respondents. Lynn, Gartner & Dunne, LLP, Mineola (Kenneth L. Gartner of counsel), for appellants. John Ciampoli, County Attorney, Mineola (Dennis J. Saffran of counsel), for respondents. PER CURIAM. Lynn, Gartner & Dunne, LLP, Mineola (Kenneth L. Gartner of counsel), for appellants. John Ciampoli, County Attorney, Mineola (Dennis J. Saffran of counsel)

  11. Section 2016 - Judicial review

    N.Y. Tax Law § 2016   Cited 252 times
    Delineating judicial review procedures for determinations of the Tax Appeals Tribunal

  12. Section 500.11 - Alternative procedure for selected appeals

    N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. tit. 22 § 500.11   Cited 536 times

    (a) On its own motion, the court may review selected appeals by an alternative procedure. Such appeals shall be determined on the intermediate appellate court record or appendix and briefs, the writings in the courts below and additional letter submissions on the merits. The clerk of the court shall notify all parties by letter when an appeal has been selected for review pursuant to this section. Appellant may request such review in its preliminary appeal statement. Respondent may request such review

  13. Section 105.20 - Resident individual

    N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. tit. 20 § 105.20   Cited 10 times   10 Legal Analyses

    Tax Law, § 605(b)(1) (a)General. An individual may be a resident of New York State for personal income tax purposes, and taxable as a resident, even though such individual would not be deemed a resident for other purposes. As used in this Subchapter, the term resident individual includes: (1) all persons domiciled in New York State, subject to the exceptions set forth in subdivision (b) of this section; and (2) any individual (other than an individual in active service in the Armed Forces of the

  14. Section 290.2 - Regulations of the State Tax Commission

    N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. tit. 20 § 290.2   1 Legal Analyses

    Tax Law, § 1312(a); Administrative Code of the City of New York, § 11-1797 (a) The rules and regulations of the State Tax Commission promulgated with respect to the taxes imposed by article 22 of the Tax Law and contained in Subchapter A of this Chapter, together with the Procedural Regulations (including the regulations on interest rate on overpayments, underpayments and recovery of erroneous refunds contained in Part 2393 of Chapter IX of this Title, and the applicable provisions of Chapters V