Argued June 4, 1975 Decided July 2, 1975 Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department, JOHN J. O'BRIEN, J. Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, JOHN P. DONOHOE, J. Robert H. Basso and Robert F. Silkey for appellant in the first above-entitled proceeding. David F. Kunz for respondent in the first above-entitled proceeding. Richard W. Rosen for appellant in the second above-entitled proceeding. Norman
No. 3592. December 14, 2010. Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Alice Schlesinger, J.), entered on or about September 8, 2009, which denied respondents' motion to dismiss the petition, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion granted. Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York (Julian L. Kalkstein of counsel), for appellants. New York Civil Liberties Union Foundation, New York (Adriana C. Piñon of counsel), for respondent. James R. Sandner, New York (Wendy M. Star
January 17, 1972. Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, THOMAS M. STARK, J. Gerald Casper for appellants. Sarisohn, Thierman Sarisohn ( Walter G. Steindler of counsel), for respondent. SHAPIRO, J. The plaintiff, a school principal with tenure, employed by the defendant Board of Education, alleges in his complaint that on or about March 13, 1969 the defendant through one Ross Headly engaged in fraud, duress and deceit which caused the plaintiff to execute a written resignation, to take effect
Argued January 11, 1960 Decided March 31, 1960 Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, D. ORMONDE RITCHIE, J. Norman Roth and Max E. Greenberg for appellant. Howard A. Rochford, C. Ellis Schiffmacher and Eugene T. Cullen for respondent. David H. Moses for Ramapo Central School District No. 2, Clarkstown Central School District No. 1, and Union Free School District No. 8, Town of Clarkstown and Orangetown, amici curiae. FULD, J. On January 3, 1956
April 8, 1963 In an action (a) for injunctive relief against the maintenance by defendants of a sewer pipeline installed upon property allegedly owned by the plaintiffs; (b) to compel the defendants to continue certain elevation work so as to provide proper drainage and prevent flooding of the plaintiffs' property; and (c) to recover money damages, the plaintiffs appeal from the following two orders of the Supreme Court, Nassau County: (1) an order, dated July 7, 1961, which denied their motion,