§Why CasetextPricing

Robert Gerrish, Respondent,v.56 Leonard LLC, et al., Appellants, et al., Defendant.

Brief

6 Cited authorities

  1. Shields v. General Electric Company

    3 A.D.3d 715 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)   Cited 59 times

    94212. Decided and Entered: January 15, 2004. Cross appeals from an order of the Supreme Court (Teresi, J.), entered January 13, 2002 in Albany County, which, inter alia, partially granted defendant General Electric Company's motion and third-party defendant's cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Goldberg Segalla L.L.P., Albany (William J. Gregan of counsel), for defendant and third-party plaintiff-appellant-respondent. Conway Kirby L.L.P., Niskayuna (Andrew W. Kirby of counsel)

  2. Jones v. Rochdale Vill., Inc.

    96 A.D.3d 1014 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)   Cited 37 times

    2012-06-27 Cheryl JONES, plaintiff-appellant, v. ROCHDALE VILLAGE, INC., appellant-respondent, Howard L. Zimmerman Architect, P.C., respondent-appellant, Arcadia Architectural Products, Inc., et al., defendants-appellants, et al., defendants. Sanders, Sanders, Block, Woycik, Viener & Grossman, P.C., Mineola, N.Y. (Aybike Donuk and Martin Block of counsel), for plaintiff-appellant. O'Connor, O'Connor, Hintz & Deveney, LLP, Melville, N.Y. (Eileen M. Baumgartner of counsel), for appellant-respondent

  3. Brogan v. Business Machs Corp.

    157 A.D.2d 76 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)   Cited 41 times
    Holding that the Labor Law applies when "the activity out of which the accident arose was an expressly integral part of the construction contract," in that the work is "necessitated by and incidental to the construction, and involve materials being readied for use in connection therewith"

  4. Gonnerman v. Huddleston

    78 A.D.3d 993 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)   Cited 14 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Applying § 23-1.29 even where there was "no evidence that [the plaintiff's work on a highway exit ramp] interfered with the traffic flow," because it was "in 'close proximity' to a . . . location where public vehicular traffic may be hazardous to the persons performing such work"

  5. The Educ. Res. Inst. Inc. v. Hawkins

    88 A.D.3d 484 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)   Cited 8 times

    2011-10-11 The EDUCATION RESOURCES INSTITUTE, INC., Plaintiff–Respondent,v.Frederick HAWKINS, Defendant–Appellant. Law Office of Annette G. Hasapidis, South Salem (Annette G. Hasapidis of counsel), for appellant.Susan R. Nudelman, Dix Hills, for respondent. MAZZARELLI, J.P., FRIEDMAN, CATTERSON, MOSKOWITZ, ABDUS–SALAAM, JJ. Law Office of Annette G. Hasapidis, South Salem (Annette G. Hasapidis of counsel), for appellant.Susan R. Nudelman, Dix Hills, for respondent. Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County

  6. McCay v. Jones-Gmo

    74 A.D.3d 615 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)   Cited 2 times   1 Legal Analyses

    June 17, 2010. Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Paul G. Feinman, J.), entered February 26, 2010, which, upon granting plaintiffs motion for reargument, granted plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of defendants-appellants' liability under Labor Law § 240 (1), unanimously affirmed, without costs. Before: Tom, J.P., Friedman, McGuire, Acosta and Román, JJ. Plaintiffs testimony that he was injured when bricks falling from above caused him to step off the plywood platform