§Why CasetextPricing

The People, Respondent,v.Luis Guaman, Appellant.

Brief

16 Cited authorities

  1. People v. Kalin

    2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 2446 (N.Y. 2009)   Cited 687 times
    In Kalin, 12 N.Y.3d 225, 878 N.Y.S.2d 653, 906 N.E.2d 381, the Court of Appeals examined an information which had charged the defendant with, among other things, criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree for the possession of nine plastic bags of heroin.

  2. People v. Chiddick

    2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 3757 (N.Y. 2007)   Cited 477 times
    In Chiddick, the Court of Appeals further held "[i]t is also relevant that [the victim] sought medical treatment... an indication that his pain was significant."

  3. People v. Dreyden

    2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 5243 (N.Y. 2010)   Cited 405 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Stating that the gravity knife law "distinguishes gravity knives from certain folding knives that cannot readily be opened by gravity or centrifugal force"

  4. People v. Jones

    2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 9070 (N.Y. 2007)   Cited 228 times
    Dismissing an information alleging disorderly conduct because there was no indication that the defendant "when he stood in the middle of the sidewalk . . . had the intent to or recklessly created a risk of causing 'public inconvenience, annoyance or alarm'"

  5. DaimlerChrysler v. Spitzer

    7 N.Y.3d 653 (N.Y. 2006)   Cited 227 times
    In Spitzer, James Warner bought a new truck manufactured by General Motors Corporation in March 2003. Shortly after acquiring the truck, Warner discovered a transmission problem and attempted to have the problem fixed on five occasions between April and November 2003.

  6. 242-44 East 77th Street, LLC v. Greater New York Mutual Insurance

    31 A.D.3d 100 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)   Cited 86 times
    Noting that "the meaning of a word in a series of words is determined by the company it keeps"

  7. People v. Tran

    80 N.Y.2d 170 (N.Y. 1992)   Cited 72 times
    In Bac Tran (80 N.Y.2d 170), the defendant Tran was the fire safety director of two Manhattan hotels with outstanding fire safety violations.

  8. WE'RE ASSOC. CO. v. COHEN

    65 N.Y.2d 148 (N.Y. 1985)   Cited 71 times

    Argued April 25, 1985 Decided June 4, 1985 Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, Henderson W. Morrison, J. Victor M. Metsch and Gerry E. Feinberg for appellant. Frederick Newman for defendant and respondents. Chief Judge WACHTLER. In this action to recover rents due and owing under a commercial lease, Special Term granted the individual defendants' motion to strike their names as parties to the action. The Appellate Division unanimously affirmed

  9. Matter of Riefberg

    58 N.Y.2d 134 (N.Y. 1983)   Cited 45 times   2 Legal Analyses

    Argued January 5, 1983 Decided February 17, 1983 Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, JOHN D. BENNETT, S. Daniel N. Fiorie for appellant. Richard M. Resnik and Joel A. Feerst for respondent. FUCHSBERG, J. This appeal is taken from an order of the Appellate Division, Second Department, which affirmed two decrees of the Surrogate's Court, Nassau County. In one proceeding, the principal question, apparently of first impression in our appellate courts

  10. In the Matter of Najee A.

    26 A.D.3d 258 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)   Cited 13 times

    7897. February 21, 2006. Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Susan R. Larabee, J.), entered on or about November 16, 2004, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determination that he committed acts, which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of sexual abuse in the first degree (two counts), forcible touching, and unlawful imprisonment in the second degree, and placed him on probation for a period of eighteen months, unanimously modified