§Why CasetextPricing

Norex Petroleum Limited, Appellant,v.Leonard Blavatnik, et al., Respondents.

Brief

7 Cited authorities

  1. Global Financial Corp. v. Triarc Corp.

    93 N.Y.2d 525 (N.Y. 1999)   Cited 283 times
    Holding that where the alleged injury was "purely economic," the non-resident corporate Plaintiff's breach of contract claims accrued in the jurisdiction in which it sustained the economic impact of the alleged breach — either the state of incorporation or its principal place of business — rather than New York, thus requiring application of the borrowing statute

  2. Insurance Co. of North America v. ABB Power Generation, Inc.

    91 N.Y.2d 180 (N.Y. 1997)   Cited 49 times
    In ABB Power, the question resolved by the New York Court of Appeals was whether the language "cause of action accrues" in state X means that a cause of action could have been brought in state X.

  3. Besser v. Squibb Sons

    146 A.D.2d 107 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)   Cited 32 times
    In Besser v. E.R. Squibb Sons, Inc., 146 A.D.2d 107, 539 N.Y.S.2d 734 (App.Div. 1st Dep't 1989), aff'd, 75 N.Y.2d 847, 552 N.Y.S.2d 923, 552 N.E.2d 171 (1990), the Appellate Division, First Department, held that the borrowing statute applies to the toxic tort "revival statute."

  4. Norex Petroleum Ltd. v. Blavatnik

    105 A.D.3d 659 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)   Cited 6 times

    2013-04-25 NOREX PETROLEUM LIMITED, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. Leonard BLAVATNIK, et al., Defendants–Respondents. Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP, Los Angeles, CA (Jonathan M. Weiss of the bar of the State of California, admitted pro hac vice, of counsel), for appellant. White & Case LLP, New York (Owen C. Pell of counsel), and Sullivan & Cromwell, New York (Darryl A. Libow and Christopher M. Viapiano of counsel), for respondents. ANDRIAS Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP, Los Angeles, CA (Jonathan M. Weiss

  5. Norex Petroleum Ltd. v. Blavatnik

    2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 33181 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2013)   Cited 1 times

    Index No. 650591/11 Motion Seq. Nos.: 07-12 06-13-2013 NOREX PETROLEUM LIMITED, Plaintiff, v. LEONARD BLAVATNIK, VICTOR VEKSELBERG, SIMON KUKES, ACCESS INDUSTRIES, INC., ALFA GROUP CONSORTIUM, RENOVA INC., OAO TYUMEN OIL COMPANY, TNK-BP LIMITED, and BP PLC, Defendants. Eileen Bransten BRANSTEN, J.: Motion sequence numbers 007, 008, 009, 010, 011 and 012 are consolidated for disposition. In motion sequence number 007, defendants Leonard Blavatnik ("Blavatnik"), Victor Vekselberg ("Vekselberg"), Simon

  6. Gaines v. City of New York

    215 N.Y. 533 (N.Y. 1915)   Cited 197 times
    In Gaines v. City of New York, 215 N.Y. 533, 539, 109 N.E. 594, 596, it was said: "The statute is designed to insure to the diligent suitor the right to a hearing in court till he reaches a judgment on the merits.

  7. Section 1367 - Supplemental jurisdiction

    28 U.S.C. § 1367   Cited 61,551 times   78 Legal Analyses
    Holding that in civil actions proceeding in federal court based solely on diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332, the district court "shall not have supplemental jurisdiction" over "claims by plaintiffs against persons made parties under Rule . . . 24" or "over claims by persons . . seeking to intervene as plaintiffs under Rule 24," if "exercising supplemental jurisdiction over such claims would be inconsistent with the jurisdictional requirements of section 1332"