§Why CasetextPricing

Norex Petroleum Limited, Appellant,v.Leonard Blavatnik, et al., Respondents.

Brief

18 Cited authorities

  1. Mine Workers v. Gibbs

    383 U.S. 715 (1966)   Cited 17,789 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that supplemental jurisdiction is a "doctrine of discretion"

  2. Finley v. United States

    490 U.S. 545 (1989)   Cited 797 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that federal courts were not conferred pendent-party jurisdiction under then-existing law

  3. Raygor v. Regents of University of Minnesota

    534 U.S. 533 (2002)   Cited 393 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding the Eleventh Amendment bars actions in federal court even where 28 U.S.C. § 1367, in general, authorizes supplemental jurisdiction

  4. Jinks v. Richland County

    538 U.S. 456 (2003)   Cited 262 times
    Holding that a statute is authorized by the Necessary and Proper Clause when it “provides an alternative to [otherwise] unsatisfactory options” that are “obviously inefficient”

  5. Mercer v. Duke University

    401 F.3d 199 (4th Cir. 2005)   Cited 137 times
    Holding that courts evaluating the degree of success on the merits between successful and unsuccessful claims should not attempt to determine what the plaintiff would have thought the more important form of relief

  6. N.Y. Cnty. Lawyers' Ass'n v. Bloomberg

    2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 7224 (N.Y. 2012)   Cited 83 times
    In County Lawyers' v. Bloomberg, 19 N.Y.3d 712, 721, 955 N.Y.S.2d 835, 979 N.E.2d 1162 [2012], the Court of Appeals provides additional guidance.

  7. Carver v. Lehman

    550 F.3d 883 (9th Cir. 2008)   Cited 83 times
    Holding that Washington law does not create a liberty interest in transfer to community custody for sex offenders

  8. Natural Res. Def. Council, Inc. v. Cnty. of L.A.

    725 F.3d 1194 (9th Cir. 2013)   Cited 70 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an NPDES permit must include compliance monitoring measures

  9. In Matter of M.B.

    2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 2235 (N.Y. 2006)   Cited 85 times
    In Matter of M.B., 6 N.Y.3d 437, 447, 813 N.Y.S.2d 349, 846 N.E.2d 794 [2006], the Court of Appeals clarified this undertaking.

  10. Vertrue Plaintiff v. Vertrue, Inc. (In re Vertrue Inc. Mktg. & Sales Practices Litig.)

    719 F.3d 474 (6th Cir. 2013)   Cited 45 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Adopting this argument

  11. Section 1367 - Supplemental jurisdiction

    28 U.S.C. § 1367   Cited 61,786 times   78 Legal Analyses
    Holding that in civil actions proceeding in federal court based solely on diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332, the district court "shall not have supplemental jurisdiction" over "claims by plaintiffs against persons made parties under Rule . . . 24" or "over claims by persons . . seeking to intervene as plaintiffs under Rule 24," if "exercising supplemental jurisdiction over such claims would be inconsistent with the jurisdictional requirements of section 1332"

  12. Rule 41 - Mandate: Contents; Issuance and Effective Date; Stay

    Fed. R. App. P. 41   Cited 2,669 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Providing that "[t]he court may shorten ... by order" the time for issuing its mandate

  13. Section 205 - Termination of action

    N.Y. CPLR 205   Cited 1,355 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Allowing plaintiffs six months to refile

  14. Section 202 - Cause of action accruing without the state

    N.Y. CPLR 202   Cited 582 times
    Limiting the limitations period for causes of action accruing outside of New York where the foreign jurisdiction imposes a shorter statute of limitations than the state does