490 U.S. 730 (1989) Cited 1,149 times 17 Legal Analyses
Holding that "In determining whether a hired party is an employee under the general common law of agency, we consider the hiring party's right to control the manner and means by which the product is accomplished" and listing several factors relevant to this inquiry
Holding the same where the indirect employer, the State of California, implemented an allegedly discriminatory skills test that was a prerequisite for the plaintiffs to gain employment with their direct employers, the school districts
Holding that paid leave there did not constitute an adverse employment action but leaving open the possibility that a paid suspension or accompanying investigation carried out in an exceptionally unreasonable or dilatory way may constitute an adverse employment action
Holding that a defendant who sexually harassed and assaulted his secretary did not do so under color of state law even though the relevant events occurred in an office where the defendant regularly conducted city business and while he was a city employee