51 Cited authorities

  1. Miranda v. Arizona

    384 U.S. 436 (1966)   Cited 52,767 times   60 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a suspect "must be clearly informed that he has the right to consult with a lawyer and to have the lawyer with him during interrogation"
  2. Boykin v. Alabama

    395 U.S. 238 (1969)   Cited 11,836 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a silent record is insufficient for a waiver of certain specified rights not at issue here
  3. Dickerson v. United States

    530 U.S. 428 (2000)   Cited 1,950 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Holding that “the protections announced in Miranda ” are “constitutionally required”
  4. Moran v. Burbine

    475 U.S. 412 (1986)   Cited 3,524 times   14 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Sixth Amendment does not apply to statements a defendant makes to police before he is indicted
  5. Moncrieffe v. Holder

    569 U.S. 184 (2013)   Cited 1,073 times   15 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "realistic probability" requires showing that "State actually prosecutes the relevant offense" in non-violent circumstances hypothesized
  6. Escobedo v. Illinois

    378 U.S. 478 (1964)   Cited 4,180 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that when a suspect is interrogated with the goal of eliciting incriminating statements and the suspect has not been warned about his or her right to remain silent, the denial of the opportunity to consult with the suspect's attorney is a violation of the Sixth Amendment
  7. Michigan v. Mosley

    423 U.S. 96 (1975)   Cited 2,139 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding a statement made after the suspect's invocation of his Miranda rights admissible when questioning resumed “only after the passage of a significant period of time and the provision of a fresh set of warnings,” and the second interrogation was restricted “to a crime that had not been a subject of the earlier interrogation”
  8. Brewer v. Williams

    430 U.S. 387 (1977)   Cited 2,006 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding a police officer violated Williams' Sixth Amendment right to counsel by “deliberately and designedly set[ting] out to elicit information from Williams just as surely as and perhaps more effectively than if he had formally interrogated him”
  9. Withrow v. Williams

    507 U.S. 680 (1993)   Cited 1,011 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that maturity is a relevant factor in analyzing the presence of police coercion
  10. New York v. Quarles

    467 U.S. 649 (1984)   Cited 1,380 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an officer's subjective motivation is irrelevant to determining the applicability of the public safety exception to Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694
  11. Section 3501 - Admissibility of confessions

    18 U.S.C. § 3501   Cited 928 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Finding of voluntariness is possible if admission made within six hours of arrest or detention; thereafter court must find reasonable ground for delay in arraigning defendant
  12. Section 1200.0 - Terminology

    N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. tit. 22 § 1200.0   Cited 1,695 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Declining or terminating representation