§Why CasetextPricing

Evans et al v. Alfa Laval Inc. et al

REPLY BRIEF re MOTION for Summary Judgment

2 Cited authorities

  1. Quirin v. Lorillard Tobacco Co.

    17 F. Supp. 3d 760 (N.D. Ill. 2014)   Cited 45 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Finding "a duty may attach where the defendant manufactured a product that, by necessity, contained asbestos components, where the asbestos-containing material was essential to the proper functioning of the defendant's product, and where the asbestos-containing material would necessarily be replaced by other asbestos-containing material, whether supplied by the original manufacturer or someone else"

  2. Killyer v. ABB, Inc. (In re Asbestos Litig.)

    Civil Action No. 15-378-GMS-SRF (D. Del. Jul. 28, 2016)

    Civil Action No. 15-378-GMS-SRF 07-28-2016 IN RE: ASBESTOS LITIGATION MARK E. HILLYER and CAROL HILLYER, his wife, Plaintiffs, v. ABB, INC., et al. Defendants. Sherry R. Fallon United States Magistrate Judge REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION I. INTRODUCTION This Report and Recommendation is limited to six pending motions for summary judgment in this asbestos-related personal injury action. The motions were filed by Defendants, ABB, Inc. ("ABB" or "ITE") (D.I. 127), CBS Corporation ("CBS" or "Westinghouse")