§Why CasetextPricing

Euro Pacific Capital Inc. v. Savoy et al

RESPONSE re Memorandum in Support of Motion

7 Cited authorities

  1. Citibank N.A. v. Kyle

    CIVIL ACTION No. 15-3298 (E.D. Pa. Jun. 16, 2015)   Cited 3 times
    Holding that "enforcing valid contractual provisions and protecting business investments, as well as confidential customer information," constitute "compelling public interests"

  2. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Wirtanen

    Case No. 15-11929 (E.D. Mich. Jun. 3, 2015)

    Case No. 15-11929 06-03-2015 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. and J.P. MORGAN SECURITIES LLC, Plaintiffs, v. DANIEL J. WIRTANEN, JR. and AIMEE S. O'DONNELL, Defendants. HONORABLE DENISE PAGE HOOD ORDER MOOTING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER , GRANTING MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND MOOTING MOTION FOR EXPEDITED DISCOVERY I. BACKGROUND This matter is before the Court on a Motion for Temporary Restraining Order, Preliminary Injunction and an Order Permitting Expedited Discovery filed

  3. UBS FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. v. JUNGGREN

    No. 3:11cv437 (MRK) (D. Conn. Mar. 30, 2011)   Cited 2 times

    No. 3:11cv437 (MRK). March 30, 2011 RULING AND ORDER MARK KRAVITZ, District Judge Defendant Peter N. Junggren, Jr. is a former employee of Plaintiff UBS Financial Services, Inc. ("UBS Financial"). Mr. Junggren served as a financial advisor at UBS Financial from January 20, 2006 through September 30, 2009. He then served as a wealth strategy associate at UBS Financial from October 1, 2009 through March 15, 2011, when he left UBS Financial and took a position at Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, LLC ("Morgan

  4. PFS Investments, Inc. v. Imhoff

    Case No. 11-10142 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 25, 2011)   Cited 1 times   1 Legal Analyses

    Case No. 11-10142. March 25, 2011 OPINION AND ORDER PATRICK DUGGAN, District Judge On January 11, 2011, PFS Investments, Inc., Primerica Financial Services, Inc. ("PFSI"), Ronald Barnes, Randall Rader, and Marcus Sonnier ("Petitioners") filed a petition in this Court to compel Kevin Imhoff to arbitrate claims that he has asserted in a pending state-court lawsuit. Before the Court is Petitioners' Motion for Summary Judgment and Request for Expedited Consideration. The matter has been fully briefed

  5. Everitt v. DeMarco

    601 F. Supp. 2d 456 (D. Conn. 2009)

    Civil Action No. 3:08-cv-543 (VLB). March 9, 2009 Jon L. Schoenhorn, Mathew Sorokin, Jon L. Schoenhorn Associates LLC, Hartford, CT, for Plaintiffs. Scott M. Karsten, Karsten, Dorman Tallberg LLC, West Hartford, CT, for Defendants. MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER DENYING THE PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR AN EMERGENCY ORDER [Doc. # 45] VANESSA BRYANT, District Judge The matter before the Court is the plaintiffs' motion for an emergency restraining order [Doc. # 45] filed on behalf of Bruce Everitt, a member

  6. A.G. Edwards Sons, Inc. v. Marcolla

    No. 07-3260 (C.D. Ill. Oct. 17, 2007)

    No. 07-3260. October 17, 2007 OPINION BYRON CUDMORE, Magistrate Judge This matter is before the Court on Defendants' Motion to Compel Arbitration and Quash Deposition Notices or, in the Alternative, for Issuance of a Protective Order (d/e 33). Defendants ask the Court to enter an order compelling expedited arbitration before the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA), staying the instant matter, and quashing deposition notices that Plaintiff served on Defendants. In the alternative, Defendants

  7. Rule 65 - Injunctions and Restraining Orders

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 65   Cited 22,610 times   88 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing court's ability to enter emergency order with less than full adversary hearing and even, in appropriate circumstances, without notice