33 Cited authorities

Hansberry v. Lee
311 U.S. 32 (1940) Cited 1,487 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding that plaintiffs seeking to enforce an agreement cannot represent class members who do not want it enforced
Luther v. Countrywide Home
533 F.3d 1031 (9th Cir. 2008) Cited 340 times 7 Legal Analyses
Holding that Securities Act claims are not removable under CAFA
Arakaki v. Cayetano
324 F.3d 1078 (9th Cir. 2003) Cited 394 times
Holding that a prospective intervenor was “not permitted to inject new, unrelated issues into the pending litigation”
U.S. v. Alisal Water Corp.
370 F.3d 915 (9th Cir. 2004) Cited 372 times
Holding that "an economic interest [that is] concrete and related to the underlying subject matter of the action" may permit a "creditor of a defendant to intervene in a lawsuit"
Northwest Forest Resource v. Glickman
82 F.3d 825 (9th Cir. 1996) Cited 396 times
Holding that “the doctrine of last antecedent ... must yield to the most logical meaning of a statute that emerges from its plain language and legislative history”
Donnelly v. Glickman
159 F.3d 405 (9th Cir. 1998) Cited 363 times
Holding that an applicant may lack an interest in the liability phase of an action, but may still be entitled to intervene in the remedies phase
Baker v. F F Investment
400 U.S. 821 (1970) Cited 246 times
Noting that holding corporate office does not per se impose a duty, but that an officer may have such a duty even if he is not the disbursing officer so long as he otherwise has sufficient power within the corporate structure
Comer v. Cisneros
37 F.3d 775 (2d Cir. 1994) Cited 281 times
Holding that equal protection claimants had standing where they were denied "the missed opportunity" to compete for suburban housing on "an equal footing"
California ex Rel. Lockyer v. U.S.
450 F.3d 436 (9th Cir. 2006) Cited 183 times
Holding that an applicant "must demonstrate a likelihood that the government will abandon or concede a potentially meritorious" position
Asplundh Manufacturing Division v. Benton Harbor Engineering
57 F.3d 1190 (3d Cir. 1995) Cited 220 times
Holding that Rule 701 gives a trial judge discretion to admit lay opinion testimony, even when the testimony concerns technical matters such as product defects, as long as the testimony meets the requirements of Rule 701
Rule 702 - Testimony by Expert Witnesses
Fed. R. Evid. 702 Cited 26,638 times 254 Legal Analyses
Adopting the Daubert standard
Rule 24 - Intervention
Fed. R. Civ. P. 24 Cited 9,158 times 34 Legal Analyses
Granting the right of intervention to qualifying persons "unless existing parties adequately represent" them
Section 133 - Appointment and number of district judges
28 U.S.C. § 133 Cited 53 times
Providing for appointment of district judges

Eunice Huthart v. News Corporation et al

33 Cited authorities

Holding that plaintiffs seeking to enforce an agreement cannot represent class members who do not want it enforced

Holding that Securities Act claims are not removable under CAFA

Holding that a prospective intervenor was “not permitted to inject new, unrelated issues into the pending litigation”

Holding that "an economic interest [that is] concrete and related to the underlying subject matter of the action" may permit a "creditor of a defendant to intervene in a lawsuit"

Holding that “the doctrine of last antecedent ... must yield to the most logical meaning of a statute that emerges from its plain language and legislative history”

Holding that an applicant may lack an interest in the liability phase of an action, but may still be entitled to intervene in the remedies phase

Noting that holding corporate office does not per se impose a duty, but that an officer may have such a duty even if he is not the disbursing officer so long as he otherwise has sufficient power within the corporate structure

Holding that equal protection claimants had standing where they were denied "the missed opportunity" to compete for suburban housing on "an equal footing"

Holding that an applicant "must demonstrate a likelihood that the government will abandon or concede a potentially meritorious" position

Holding that Rule 701 gives a trial judge discretion to admit lay opinion testimony, even when the testimony concerns technical matters such as product defects, as long as the testimony meets the requirements of Rule 701

Adopting the Daubert standard

Granting the right of intervention to qualifying persons "unless existing parties adequately represent" them

Providing for appointment of district judges