30 Cited authorities

Arbaugh v. Y H Corp.
546 U.S. 500 (2006) Cited 8,134 times 27 Legal Analyses
Holding that Title VII's numerosity requirement is nonjurisdictional even though it serves the important policy goal of “spar[ing] very small businesses from Title VII liability”
Steel Co. v. Citizens for Better Env't
523 U.S. 83 (1998) Cited 11,076 times 15 Legal Analyses
Holding this court may raise the issue of "statutory jurisdiction" sua sponte
Clapper v. Amnesty Int'l USA
568 U.S. 398 (2013) Cited 3,267 times 169 Legal Analyses
Holding that, in the absence of some independent existing or impending harm, plaintiffs "cannot manufacture standing merely by inflicting harm on themselves"
Lance v. Coffman
549 U.S. 437 (2007) Cited 600 times
Holding that plaintiffs lacked standing because “[t]he only injury [they] allege is that the law ... has not been followed”
Oubre v. Entergy Operations, Inc.
522 U.S. 422 (1998) Cited 291 times 5 Legal Analyses
Holding that an employee may waive ADEA rights if the waiver complies with the OWBPA
Anderson v. Coors Brewing Company
181 F.3d 1171 (10th Cir. 1999) Cited 939 times
Holding that the district court properly considered the essential functions of the position for which the plaintiff was hired, as opposed to those of the narrower position to which she was assigned
Shikles v. Sprint/United Management Co.
426 F.3d 1304 (10th Cir. 2005) Cited 405 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding that administrative exhaustion is a jurisdictional prerequisite to an ADEA suit
Ramirez v. Oklahoma Dept. of Mental Health
41 F.3d 584 (10th Cir. 1994) Cited 356 times
Holding time span of one and one-half months between protected activity and adverse employment action did not warrant dismissal of retaliation claim
Whitehead v. Oklahoma Gas Elec. Co.
187 F.3d 1184 (10th Cir. 1999) Cited 86 times
Holding an argument waived on appeal for failure to raise the issue in objection to the magistrate's recommendation
Pretlow v. Garrison
420 F. App'x 798 (10th Cir. 2011) Cited 47 times
Concluding that dismissal was appropriate because Pretlow referred "to EEO complaints without any indication that he pursued these to completion before filing this case"
Section 623 - Prohibition of age discrimination
29 U.S.C. § 623 Cited 10,232 times 51 Legal Analyses
Holding that under the ADEA, it is unlawful to discriminate against individuals who are at least forty years of age
Section 626 - Recordkeeping, investigation, and enforcement
29 U.S.C. § 626 Cited 6,105 times 44 Legal Analyses
Adopting the statute of limitations under the Portal-to-Portal Pay Act, 29 U.S.C. § 255

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. CollegeAmerica Denver, Inc.

30 Cited authorities

Holding that Title VII's numerosity requirement is nonjurisdictional even though it serves the important policy goal of “spar[ing] very small businesses from Title VII liability”

Holding this court may raise the issue of "statutory jurisdiction" sua sponte

Holding that, in the absence of some independent existing or impending harm, plaintiffs "cannot manufacture standing merely by inflicting harm on themselves"

Holding that plaintiffs lacked standing because “[t]he only injury [they] allege is that the law ... has not been followed”

Holding that an employee may waive ADEA rights if the waiver complies with the OWBPA

Holding that the district court properly considered the essential functions of the position for which the plaintiff was hired, as opposed to those of the narrower position to which she was assigned

Holding that administrative exhaustion is a jurisdictional prerequisite to an ADEA suit

Holding time span of one and one-half months between protected activity and adverse employment action did not warrant dismissal of retaliation claim

Holding an argument waived on appeal for failure to raise the issue in objection to the magistrate's recommendation

Concluding that dismissal was appropriate because Pretlow referred "to EEO complaints without any indication that he pursued these to completion before filing this case"

Holding that under the ADEA, it is unlawful to discriminate against individuals who are at least forty years of age

Adopting the statute of limitations under the Portal-to-Portal Pay Act, 29 U.S.C. § 255