§Why CasetextPricing

Endress v. Gentiva Health Services, Inc. et al

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER; It is hereby ORDERED, that the Defendants motion to dismiss the amended consolidated class action complaint is granted

6 Cited authorities

  1. Section 78j - Manipulative and deceptive devices

    15 U.S.C. § 78j   Cited 12,843 times   167 Legal Analyses
    Granting SEC power to establish rules to further statute forbidding manipulative or deceptive devices in connection with purchase or sale of securities

  2. Section 78u-4 - Private securities litigation

    15 U.S.C. § 78u-4   Cited 7,774 times   53 Legal Analyses
    Granting courts authority to permit discovery if necessary "to preserve evidence or to prevent undue prejudice to" a party

  3. Section 78t - Liability of controlling persons and persons who aid and abet violations

    15 U.S.C. § 78t   Cited 4,093 times   20 Legal Analyses
    Holding liable any person "who, directly or indirectly, controls any person liable under any provision of this chapter or of any rule or regulation thereunder"

  4. Section 78u - Investigations and actions

    15 U.S.C. § 78u   Cited 2,418 times   88 Legal Analyses
    Granting the SEC the power to seek civil penalties for violations of the Exchange Act

  5. Section 240.10b-5 - Employment of manipulative and deceptive devices

    17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5   Cited 9,449 times   136 Legal Analyses
    Holding liable any person who "make any untrue statement of material fact"

  6. Section 409.43 - Plan of care requirements

    42 C.F.R. § 409.43   Cited 13 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing the government's “authority to reduce or disapprove requests for anticipated payments in situations when protecting Medicare program integrity warrants this action” and stating that “the request for anticipated payment will be canceled and recovered unless the claim is submitted within the greater of 60 days from the end of the episode or 60 days from the issuance of the request for anticipated payment.”