Hartless v. Clorox Co.
473 F. App'x 716 (9th Cir. 2012) Cited 2 timesNoting that an objector's benefit must be "actual and concrete not conceptual or doctrinal"
Stern v. Gambello
No. 10-56929 (9th Cir. May. 17, 2012)No. 10-56929 D.C. No. 8:09-cv-01112-CAS-AGR No. 10-57062 05-17-2012 HEATHER STERN; BROOKE RANDOLPH; JOHN GIRARD; MARTIN SCHNALL; NATHAN RIENSCHE; KELLY LEMONS, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs - Appellees, v. MARC GAMBELLO; GENE HOPKINS, Objectors - Appellants, NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS SERVICES, INC., a Delaware corporation, FKA AT&T Wireless Services, Inc.; AT&T MOBILITY CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, FKA Cingular Wireless Corporation; AT&T MOBILITY LLC, a