§Why CasetextPricing

Elsevier Inc. v. Grossman et al

MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 174 SECOND MOTION for Writ of Attachment as to J.P. Morgan Chase Bank N.A. to attach funds of defaulting Defendant Publicacoes Tecnicas Internacionais currently held in the account of defaulting defendant International Bibliographic Services Corp. Letter Memorandum in Support of Motion. Document

3 Cited authorities

  1. Thornapple Associates, Inc. v. Sahagen

    06 Civ. 6412(JFK) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 12, 2007)   Cited 8 times

    06 Civ. 6412(JFK). March 12, 2007 OPINION ORDER JOHN KEENAN, Senior District Judge Plaintiff Thornapple Associates, Inc. ("Thornapple") commenced this action against Defendants Peter Sahagen and Sahagen Consulting Group, LLC (collectively, "Sahagen", or "Defendants") to recover $115,005.46, plus accrued interest, in unpaid charges for expert witness consulting services rendered by Thornapple on Sahagen's behalf during a securities arbitration in which Sahagen was a claimant. Pursuant to Rule 64 of

  2. Graubard v. Kostantinides

    709 F. Supp. 428 (S.D.N.Y. 1989)   Cited 6 times
    Finding attachment under CPLR 6201 appropriate where plaintiff sought to attach defendant's bank account, because " [t]hese accounts, by nature, are liquid and can be easily transferred from the jurisdiction by a simple telephone call" and " if plaintiff were then to recover a judgment against the defendants, plaintiff would be in the inauspicious position of having to chase defendants" to other venues

  3. Section 6201 - Grounds for attachment

    N.Y. CPLR 6201   Cited 668 times
    Setting forth grounds for prejudgment attachment under New York law